Home | About IJMPO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 

CASE REPORT
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 14-15 Table of Contents     

An unusual penile spindle cell malignancy


1 Department of Pathology , St. John's Medical College, Bangalore-560034, India
2 Department of Urology , St. John's Medical College, Bangalore-560034, India

Date of Web Publication30-May-2009

Correspondence Address:
T Rajalakshmi
Department of Pathology , St. John's Medical College, Bangalore-560034
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.51416

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Primary non-epithelial malignancies of the penis are rare. We report a patient with an unusual presentation of an unexpected spindle cell malignancy at this site. A 35- year-old man presented with a mass in the shaft of the penis with inguinal lymphadenopathy. A malignant spindle cell neoplasm was seen involving the corpora, consistent with leiomyosarcoma. Immunohistochemically, the tumour was positive for S100, HMB-45 and negative for SMA. A final diagnosis of amelanotic spindle cell melanoma was made. This case is being presented to reiterate the importance of including melanoma in the differential diagnosis of spindle cell sarcomas at uncommon sites.


How to cite this article:
Francis A, Rajalakshmi T, Garg I, Mohanty S, Anuradha A, Rout P, Mohan A. An unusual penile spindle cell malignancy. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2008;29:14-5

How to cite this URL:
Francis A, Rajalakshmi T, Garg I, Mohanty S, Anuradha A, Rout P, Mohan A. An unusual penile spindle cell malignancy. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2020 Oct 23];29:14-5. Available from: https://www.ijmpo.org/text.asp?2008/29/3/14/51416


  Case Top


A 35-year-old man presented with a progressively enlarging, hard, nodular, ulcerated mass in the proximal shaft of the penis, first noticed 7 months back. He also had left inguinal lymphadenopathy. A biopsy of the lesion done elsewhere was reported as Non-keratinising squamous cell carcinoma, but the slides were not available for review.

His routine investigations were within normal limits. CT scan of the abdomen and penis showed bilateral external iliac and inguinal lymphnodes with right hydrocele and a heterogeneously enhancing penile mass. He underwent a total Penectomy. Gross examination of specimen revealed a ulcerated nodule measuring 5 Χ 4 cm in the shaft, the cut surface of which was firm, lobulated and grey-white. The tumour was seen involving the corpora and extending upto glans with free urethral and corporal surgical margins.

On microscopic examination, a malignant spindle cell neoplasm was seen involving the corpora. The tumour cells were arranged in whorls and fascicles, with blunt ovoid nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli, reminiscent of smooth muscle differentiation. [Figure 1] The mitotic rate was 8-9 per 10 hpf and necrosis was noted. The overlying skin was ulcerated. The urethra and corporal margins were uninvolved. A morphological diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma was made and immunohistochemistry was advised for confirmation. The tumour was positive for Vimentin, S-100 and HMB-45 and negative for Smooth Muscle Actin and Cytokeratin, ruling out Leiomyosarcoma and spindle cell carcinoma. With the above immunoprofile, a final diagnosis of amelanotic spindle cell melanoma was made. Slides of the main tumour were reviewed. There was no melanocytic proliferation in the overlying skin. FNAC of the inguinal lymph nodes showed metastatic spindle cell neoplasm with a similar morphology. A lymph node dissection was scheduled, but the patient refused any further intervention. A detailed clinical examination did not reveal evidence of a melanoma elsewhere in the body. The patient decided to take further treatment in his hometown.


  Discussion Top


Primary non-epithelial malignancies of the penis are rare. [1],[2] The most common ones have a vascular origin. Kaposi sarcoma and leiomyosarcoma are the commonest mesenchymal malignancies encountered at this site. Leiomyosarcomas are usually seen in mid or late adult life and are more common in the shaft and base of penis. Microscopically, these tumours contain spindled cells with nuclear atypia, mitotic activity and a fascicular growth pattern. On immunohistochemistry, a positive reaction for Smooth Muscle Actin and desmin is noted. Leiomyosarcomas have a greater propensity for local recurrence.

Primary melanomas constitute <2% of all primary penile tumours. Only about 100 cases have been reported in literature, since 1859, mostly case reports. [3] The largest series is of 19 cases seen over 25 years. [4] They are usually seen in ages between 50 and 70 years. 60 - 80% melanomas arise on the glans penis, <10% involve the prepuce and the remainder arises on the skin of the shaft [2] . Most of the primary penile melanomas are pigmented. [1] The common histologic subtypes reported include nodular, superficial spreading and mucosal lentiginous, all of them containing cytoplasmic melanin. The peculiarities of the present case are: a) The overlying skin showed no melanocytic proliferation b) the tumour was amelanotic and c) Prominent nucleoli, said to be another hallmark of melanoma cells, was absent.

Among prognostic factors, the Breslow index (level of invasion) is the most important, specially tumours of depth above 3.5 mm. [2],[4] Melanomas metastasize early via lymphatic vessels to superficial and deep inguinal lymphnodes and external iliac lymphnodes. As anastomoses are common, there can be bilateral or contralateral involvement [1] . Patients with nodal metastases generally die within 2 years. [4]

The treatment of penile melanomas is surgical. When the lesion involves the glans, the suggested treatment is total amputation with bilateral radical groin dissection with or without dissection of the iliac and obturator lymphnodes. The benefit conferred by radiotherapy and chemotherapy in penile melanomas is limited. [1] The overall prognosis in cases of penile melanomas is poor - a 30% 5 year survival. [5] Additional adverse prognostic factors include ulceration and tumour diameter greater than 15 mm. [4]

The correct diagnosis in this case could be established only with the help of immunohistochemistry, as histology was atypical. An awareness of this rare entity and judicious use of ancillary tests are mandated for timely diagnosis.

 
  References Top

1.Jorgen O, Parvel M. Malignant melanoma of the penis and male urethra. Report of nine cases and review of literarure. Cancer 1987;59:581-587   Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Eble J.N., et al. (Eds): WHO Classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Tumours of the penis. IARC Press: Lyon 2004;279-298.   Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Parra Muntaner L, Madrid Garcia FJ, Sanchez Merino JM et al. Penile primary melanoma; report of a case. Arch Esp Urol 2000;53(4):375-6.   Back to cited text no. 3      
4.van Geel AN, den Bakker MA, Kirkels W et al. Prognosis of primary mucosal penile melanoma: a series of 19 Dutch patients and 47 patients from the literature. Urology 2007;70(1):143-7.   Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Roy S, Rogers III, Lawrence E, Gibson. Mucosal, Genital and unusual clinical variants of melanoma. Mayo Clinic Proc 1997;72:362-366.  Back to cited text no. 5      


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
   Case
   Discussion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1498    
    Printed101    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded182    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal