Home | About IJMPO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 

 Table of Contents      
COURTING CONTROVERSY
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 41  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 735-737  

Treatment options for patients with brain metastatic disease in HER2-positive breast cancer


Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission17-Mar-2020
Date of Decision03-May-2020
Date of Acceptance14-May-2020
Date of Web Publication29-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Manikandan Dhanushkodi
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), 38, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai - 600 036, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_98_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Dhanushkodi M. Treatment options for patients with brain metastatic disease in HER2-positive breast cancer. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2020;41:735-7

How to cite this URL:
Dhanushkodi M. Treatment options for patients with brain metastatic disease in HER2-positive breast cancer. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 30];41:735-7. Available from: https://www.ijmpo.org/text.asp?2020/41/5/735/299564

A 50-year-old postmenopausal female who had early breast cancer (ER-PR− and HER2+) was initially treated with surgery (pT2N1M0), followed by 6 cycles TCH (docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab) and maintenance trastuzumab for 1 year. Six months after completing trastuzumab, she presented with headache, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed multiple bilateral brain metastases. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography revealed no other systemic disease. After whole-brain irradiation, she was treated with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1). After 4 cycles of the same, a repeat MRI brain showed stability of prior lesions, but a few new lesions suggestive of disease progression. There was still no evidence of any other systemic disease. She has no comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1, and all blood tests were within normal limits. How should we treat her?

  1. Lapatinib + capecitabine
  2. Tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine
  3. Neratinib + capecitabine
  4. Pyrotinib + capecitabine
  5. Trastuzumab + capecitabine
  6. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a)
  7. Any other.


The outcome of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has significantly increased with the advent of anti-HER2 therapies. The CLEOPATRA trial update showed that patients with HER2-positive ABC treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab had an 8-year overall survival (OS) of 37%.[1] Patients with hormone-positive status, metastasis limited to nodes/local site, and use of trastuzumab had shown to improve survival in HER2-positive ABC.[2] The summary of the trials in HER2-positive ABC is shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary of trials in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer

Click here to view


The preferred treatment option would be tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine. Tucatinib is a potent, selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that showed high efficacy in patients with HER2-positive ABC who were prior exposed to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and Ado-TDM-1.[3] HER2CLIMB is a Phase 3, randomized controlled trial in patients with HER2-positive ABC (with or without brain metastasis) that showed that tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as compared to trastuzumab + capecitabine. This trial enrolled patients with brain metastasis and 48% had brain metastasis at baseline.

The 1-year PFS was 33% for tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine and 12% for trastuzumab + capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54; confidence interval [CI]: 0.42–0.71; P < 0.001). In patients with brain metastasis, the 1-year PFS was 25% with tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine and 0% in patients who received trastuzumab + capecitabine.[4] Tucatinib with Ado-TDM-1 has also shown efficacy in heavily pretreated HER2-positive ABC.[5] The common side effects of tucatinib include diarrhea, hand–foot syndrome, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. In April 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine, for adult patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, including patients with brain metastases, who have received one or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting.

The other treatment option would be trastuzumab deruxtecan. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor (exatecan). It is FDA approved based on a Phase 2 trial (DESTINY-Breast01) of heavily treated HER2-positive ABC (median 6 lines of prior therapy) that showed an impressive response rate and PFS of 60% and 16 months, respectively.[6] The median PFS was 18 months among the patients who had asymptomatic brain metastasis. The common side effects include neutropenia, anemia, and nausea. Patients need to be monitored for cough or shortness of breath as interstitial lung disease (14%) is a known side effect. The limitations include the exclusion of patients with untreated or symptomatic brain metastasis, Phase 2 design, and immature OS data. The DESTINY-Breast02 trial is an ongoing Phase 3, randomized controlled study (RCT) comparing trastuzumab deruxtecan with trastuzumab + capecitabine and lapatinib + capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive ABC who had prior exposure to trastuzumab emtansine. The DESTINY-Breast03 is an ongoing Phase 3, RCT comparing trastuzumab deruxtecan with Ado-TDM-1 in patients with HER 2-positive ABC who were prior treated with trastuzumab and taxane.

Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER2 kinase inhibitor. The NALA trial showed an improved 1-PFS in patients who received neratinib + capecitabine (38%) as compared to lapatinib +

capecitabine (15%).[7] Time to intervention for symptomatic CNS disease was delayed in neratinib + capecitabine (23%) as compared to lapatinib + capecitabine (29%). The limitations include unpublished trial, lack of OS data, Grade 3 diarrhea (24%) with neratinib + capecitabine, and need for loperamide prophylaxis. The NEfERT-T Phase 3 RCT enrolled 479 patients with untreated HER2-positive ABC including asymptomatic brain metastasis and showed that neratinib–paclitaxel was not superior to trastuzumab–paclitaxel. However, patients who received neratinib–paclitaxel had a lower incidence of central nervous system recurrences (HR, 0.48; CI, 0.29–0.79; P =0.002) and delayed time to central nervous system metastases (HR, 0.45; CI, 0.26–0.78; P = 0.004).[8]

Pyrotinib is an irreversible dual pan-HER2 kinase inhibitor. A Chinese Phase 2 study showed an improved response and PFS in patients who received pyrotinib + capecitabine as compared to lapatinib + capecitabine.[9] The median PFS was 18 months with pyrotinib + capecitabine and 7 months with lapatinib + capecitabine (HR, 0.36; CI, 0.23–0.58; P < 0.01). It is currently approved in combination with capecitabine in China for the treatment of HER 2-positive ABC previously treated with anthracycline and taxane.[10] The limitations include Phase 2 design, small sample size (n = 128), immature OS data, and exclusion of patients with brain metastasis.

Lapatinib is a reversible dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets and inhibits HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor. The EMILIA trial, a Phase 3 RCT, showed that response, PFS, and OS of patients with HER2-positive ABC who received lapatinib + capecitabine were 31%, 6 months, and 25 months, respectively.[11] The limitations include the exclusion of patients with prior exposure to Ado-TDM-1 and symptomatic brain metastasis. A French Phase 2 trial included 45 patients with HER2-positive ABC with untreated brain metastasis. Among them, 57% had neurological signs and symptoms and were treated with lapatinib and capecitabine. The intracranial response was 66% at a median follow-up of 21 months.[12] A study from the United States showed that stereotactic radiosurgery concurrent with lapatinib improved local control without increasing radiation necrosis in HER 2-positive ABC with brain metastasis.[13]

Margetuximab is a novel antibody that targets HER2-positive breast cancer with Fc engineering that alters the Fc receptor affinity. SOFIA trial showed that margetuximab with chemotherapy improved PFS as compared to trastuzumab with chemotherapy.[14] The median PFS with margetuximab + chemotherapy (5.8 months) and lapatinib + chemotherapy (4.9 months) (HR, 0.76; CI, 0.59–0.98; P = 0.033). The limitations include unpublished trial, a marginal improvement in PFS, and immature OS.

Trastuzumab duocarmazine is a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate with cleavable linker duocarmycin payload. In patients with heavily pretreated HER2-positive ABC, this showed a response and PFS of 33% and 9 months, respectively.[15] The limitations include the Phase 1 study and the small sample size.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Swain SM, Kim SB, Cortés J, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:519-30.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Yardley DA, Tripathy D, Brufsky AM, Rugo HS, Kaufman PA, Mayer M, et al. Long-term survivor characteristics in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer from registHER. Br J Cancer 2014;110:2756-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Murthy R, Borges VF, Conlin A, Chaves J, Chamberlain M, Gray T. Tucatinib with capecitabine and trastuzumab in advanced HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with and without brain metastases: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:880-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, Paplomata E, Hamilton E, Hurvitz SA, et al. Tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:597-609.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Borges VF, Ferrario C, Aucoin N, Falkson C, Khan Q, Krop I, et al. Tucatinib combined with ado-trastuzumab emtansine in advanced ERBB2/HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A phase 1b clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:1214-20.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, Park YH, Kim SB, Tamura K. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer. New England J Med 2019;382:610-21.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Saura C, Oliveira M, Feng YH, Dai MS, Hurvitz SA, Kim SB. Neratinib+capecitabine versus lapatinib+capecitabine in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer previously treated with ≥2 HER2-directed regimens: Findings from the multinational, randomized, phase III NALA trial. JCO 2019;37:1002.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Awada A, Colomer R, Inoue K, Bondarenko I, Badwe RA, Demetriou G, et al. Neratinib plus paclitaxel vs. trastuzumab plus paclitaxel in previously untreated metastatic ERBB2-positive breast cancer: The NEfERT-T randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:1557-64.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ma F, Ouyang Q, Li W, Jiang Z, Tong Z, Liu Y, et al. Pyrotinib or lapatinib combined with capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with prior taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab: A randomized, phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:2610-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Blair HA. Pyrotinib:First global approval. Drugs 2018;78:1751-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. New England J Med 2012;367:1783-91.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bachelot T, Romieu G, Campone M, Diéras V, Cropet C, Dalenc F, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (LANDSCAPE): A single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:64-71.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Parsai S, Miller JA, Juloori A, Chao ST, Kotecha R, Mohammadi AM, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent lapatinib is associated with improved local control for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. J Neurosurg 2019;132:503-11.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Rugo HS, Im SA, Wright GL, Escriva-de-Romani S, DeLaurentiis M, Cortes J. SOPHIA primary analysis: A phase 3 (P3) study of margetuximab (M)+ chemotherapy (C) versus trastuzumab (T)+C in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic (met) breast cancer (MBC) after prior anti-HER2 therapies (Tx). JCO 2019;37:1000.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Saura C, Thistlethwaite F, Banerji U, Lord S, Moreno V, MacPherson I. A phase I expansion cohorts study of SYD985 in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. JCO 2018;36:1014.  Back to cited text no. 15
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed132    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal