Search

Recent Articles

IJMPO—A Journey of a Thousand Miles

Author : Padmaj S. Kulkarni

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment—T-Cells Hold the Key in Severe Cases

Author : Kunal Das, Nitika Agrawal, Mansi Kala, Rakhee Khanduri

Why Is China Importing COVID-19 Vaccine Now?

Author : Purvish M. Parikh

Promoting of Oncology Training and Education in India: Lessons from our unique oncology continuing medical education project

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2014; 35(02): 175

DOI: DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.138996


Publication History

Article published online:
19 July 2021

© 2014. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

The Indian Cooperative Oncology Network is a public charitable trust [ICON (Indian cooperative Oncology Network) Trust] that is working since 1999. One of the mission statements is to optimize the outcome of cancer patients. Today, only about a third of all cancers diagnosed in India get cured. This is at the time when cure rates in some developed countries have risen to 65%. One of the main challenges in India is the advanced stage of the cancer at the time of presentation to the center of excellence or the regional cancer center. Hence ICON Trust decided to focus on this aspect by initiating the Promoting of Oncology Training and Education project via continuing medical educations (CME's) across India.

Promoting of Oncology Training and Education began in the year 2008. Initially, about 100 oncologists got together to discuss and finalize the agenda, scope, execution and monitoring of the program. A fixed agenda, speaker notes and PowerPoint presentation slides were decided upon by experts in the field. The evaluation process (pre and post CME) for each session was also frozen. These oncologists served as faculty, with the senior most from each region of the country taking on the mantle of Program Directors. The programs were directed specifically at the healthcare professionals who were most likely to see a cancer patient first, the family physicians (general practitioners [GPs]).

Each program was a full day event with a focus on current epidemiology and future projections, early signs of cancer, common cancers, counseling, practical demonstrations and finally a general panel discussion. About 100 GPs were registered for each program. They were administered an initial multiple choice questions (MCQs) test to document their baseline understanding. At the end of the program, the same MCQs were repeated, and the difference documented the benefit of the program. A total of 202 such programs has been conducted in the last 7 years, spanning the length and breadth of India benefiting 17,242 GPs and other physicians. At the end of the 1st year, the expert group met to take stock of the program and the agenda, slides and speaker notes were fine-tuned based on the discussions among the faculty and feedback from the participating GPs. Subsequently, the program was expanded to include organ-specific cancers (lung cancer for chest physicians, women cancers for gynecologists and head neck cancers for ENT surgeons).

The success of this program led to a successful collaboration between ICON Trust and the Ministry of Health, Government of India. ICON Trust was then able to roll out an oncology training program ratified by the government for all the 336 medical colleges of India. So far 26 such programs have been successfully completed involving 2987 students.

We plan to continue expanding this activity and continue modifying it as necessary. We will cover healthcare professionals in other areas and am sure that this will ultimately lead to early diagnosis of cancer and their timely referral to appropriate centers capable of imparting potentially curative therapy. We thank Dr. Reddys for consistently supporting this activity over the last 7 years and encourage others (scientific medical organizations, as well as healthcare industry) to roll out such programs in the interest of our nation's health.


    References

    1. Sharma S, Mishra K, Agarwal S, Khanna G. Solid tumors of childhood. Indian J Pediatr 2004;71:501-4.
    2. Lanier AP, Holck P, Ehrsam Day G, Key C. Childhood cancer among Alaska Natives. Pediatrics 2003;112:e396.
    3. Kusumakumary P, Jacob R, Jothirmayi R, Nair MK. Profile of pediatric malignancies: A ten year study. Indian Pediatr 2000;37:1234-8.
    4. Fajardo-Gutiérrez A, Juárez-Ocaña S, González-Miranda G, Palma-Padilla V, Carreón-Cruz R, Ortega-Alvárez MC, et al. Incidence of cancer in children residing in ten jurisdictions of the Mexican Republic: Importance of the Cancer registry (a population-based study). BMC Cancer 2007;7:68.
    5. Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition. Cancer 2005;103:1457-67.
    6. Maitra A. Diseases of infancy and childhood. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC, editors. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 8 th ed. Pennsylvania: Saunders; 2010. p. 447-83.
    7. Hicks J, Mierau GW. The spectrum of pediatric tumors in infancy, childhood, and adolescence: A comprehensive review with emphasis on special techniques in diagnosis. Ultrastruct Pathol 2005;29:175-202.
    8. Mamatha HS, Kumari BA, Appaji L, Attili SV, Padma D, Vidya J. Profile of infantile malignancies at tertiary cancer center - A study from south India. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:20026. (Meeting Abstracts).
    9. Banerjee CK, Walia BN, Pathak IC. Pattern of neoplasms in children. Indian J Pediatr 1986;53:93-7.
    10. Fischer PR, Ahuka LO, Wood PB, Lucas S. Malignant tumors in children of northeastern Zaire. A comparison of distribution patterns. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1990;29:95-8.
    11. Lee CK, Ham EK, Kim KY, Chi JG. A histopathologic study on tumors of childhood and adolescence. J KCRA 1966;1:75-80.
    12. Malone M. Soft tissue tumours in childhood. Histopathology 1993;23:203-16.
    13. Kaneda HJ, Mack J, Kasales CJ, Schetter S. Pediatric and adolescent breast masses: A review of pathophysiology, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:W204-12.
    14. Bock K, Duda VF, Hadji P, Ramaswamy A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Klose KJ, et al. Pathologic breast conditions in childhood and adolescence: Evaluation by sonographic diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:1347-54.
    15. Demircan M, Balik E. Pilomatricoma in children: A prospective study. Pediatr Dermatol 1997;14:430-2.
    16. Linabery AM, Ross JA. Trends in childhood cancer incidence in the U.S. (1992-2004). Cancer 2008;112:416-32.
    17. Ljungman G, Jakobson A, Behrendtz M, Ek T, Friberg LG, Hjalmars U, et al. Incidence and survival analyses in children with solid tumours diagnosed in Sweden between 1983 and 2007. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:750-7.
    18. Eyre R, Feltbower RG, Mubwandarikwa E, Jenkinson HC, Parkes S, Birch JM, et al. Incidence and survival of childhood bone cancer in northern England and the West Midlands, 1981-2002. Br J Cancer 2009;100:188-93.
    19. McNally RJ, Kelsey AM, Cairns DP, Taylor GM, Eden OB, Birch JM. Temporal increases in the incidence of childhood solid tumors seen in Northwest England (1954-1998) are likely to be real. Cancer 2001;92:1967-76.
    20. Parham DM, Ellison DA. Rhabdomyosarcomas in adults and children: An update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1454-65.
    21. Kachanov DY, Dobrenkov KV, Abdullaev RT, Shamanskaya TV, Varfolomeeva SR. Incidence and survival of pediatric soft tissue sarcomas in moscow region, Russian Federation, 2000-2009. Sarcoma 2012;2012:350806.
    22. Toma P, Granata C, Rossi A, Garaventa A. Multimodality imaging of Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphomas in children. Radiographics 2007;27:1335-54.
    23. Madhavan J, Ganesh A, Roy J, Biswas J, Kumaramanickavel G. The relationship between tumor cell differentiation and age at diagnosis in retinoblastoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2008;45:22-5.
    24. Ueno T, Tanaka YO, Nagata M, Tsunoda H, Anno I, Ishikawa S, et al. Spectrum of germ cell tumors: From head to toe. Radiographics 2004;24:387-404.
    25. Gatta G, Capocaccia R, Stiller C, Kaatsch P, Berrino F, Terenziani M, et al. Childhood cancer survival trends in Europe: A EUROCARE Working Group study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3742-51.