Search

Recent Articles

IJMPO—A Journey of a Thousand Miles

Author : Padmaj S. Kulkarni

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment—T-Cells Hold the Key in Severe Cases

Author : Kunal Das, Nitika Agrawal, Mansi Kala, Rakhee Khanduri

Why Is China Importing COVID-19 Vaccine Now?

Author : Purvish M. Parikh

Clinical profile and outcomes of Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in children: A report from a tertiary care hospital from India

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2019; 40(01): 41-47

DOI: DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_70_18

Abstract

Background: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is an aggressive malignancy. Its outcome has improved over the past decades. Although it accounts for 8%–10% of all childhood cancers, very less information about its clinical presentation and outcomes is available from India. Our objective was to study the clinical presentation and outcomes in children (<15 class="b" xss=removed>Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed 26 children diagnosed with NHL at our center from August 2008 to June 2014 and followed them up to May 2017. Results: The median age at the time of diagnosis was 7.7 years (2.5–13 years). Abdominal distension and an abdominal lump were the most common presenting features occurring in 75%, followed by fever (73.8%) and weight loss (46.2%). Most patients had advanced-stage (Stage III/IV, 92.3%) disease at presentation. The primary presentation was extranodal in 57.7%, nodal in 26.9%, and combined in 15.4%. Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) was the most common subtype (46.2%), followed by T-lymphoblastic lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Three patients did not take treatment. The median follow-up of patients was 48 months (36–99 months). Nineteen patients achieved remission and four had progressive disease. Significantly better event-free survival (EFS) was found with younger age and lower stage of presentation. The EFS did not significantly differ with sex, group of disease, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and presenting features. Conclusions: Our cohort of patients with NHL showed characteristics similar to those reported from other developing countries. NHL occurred at a younger age, with a higher incidence of BL. The outcome for patients aged >10 years was poor. The outcome of NHL was comparable to that of other centers in the world.



Publication History

Article published online:
08 June 2021

© 2019. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

Abstract

Background: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is an aggressive malignancy. Its outcome has improved over the past decades. Although it accounts for 8%–10% of all childhood cancers, very less information about its clinical presentation and outcomes is available from India. Our objective was to study the clinical presentation and outcomes in children (<15 class="b" xss=removed>Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed 26 children diagnosed with NHL at our center from August 2008 to June 2014 and followed them up to May 2017. Results: The median age at the time of diagnosis was 7.7 years (2.5–13 years). Abdominal distension and an abdominal lump were the most common presenting features occurring in 75%, followed by fever (73.8%) and weight loss (46.2%). Most patients had advanced-stage (Stage III/IV, 92.3%) disease at presentation. The primary presentation was extranodal in 57.7%, nodal in 26.9%, and combined in 15.4%. Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) was the most common subtype (46.2%), followed by T-lymphoblastic lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Three patients did not take treatment. The median follow-up of patients was 48 months (36–99 months). Nineteen patients achieved remission and four had progressive disease. Significantly better event-free survival (EFS) was found with younger age and lower stage of presentation. The EFS did not significantly differ with sex, group of disease, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and presenting features. Conclusions: Our cohort of patients with NHL showed characteristics similar to those reported from other developing countries. NHL occurred at a younger age, with a higher incidence of BL. The outcome for patients aged >10 years was poor. The outcome of NHL was comparable to that of other centers in the world.


Introduction

Malignant lymphomas (including non -Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL] and HL) are the third most common group of malignancies in children after leukemias and brain tumors. They account for 15% of all childhood malignancies in children younger than 20 years.[1] Approximately 60% of pediatric lymphomas are NHL, whereas the rest are HL.[2]

Most NHLs in children present as an aggressive disseminated disease. Potential clinical emergencies in patients with NHL prior to diagnosis are superior/inferior vena cava obstruction, acute airway obstruction, spinal cord compression, pericardial tamponade, intussusception/intestinal obstruction, and central nervous system (CNS) complications. The outcome of childhood NHL has improved progressively over the past decade to about 80%–90% with intensive risk-adapted multiagent therapy.[3],[4],[5]

In developing countries, there are many obstacles to the treatment of childhood lymphomas. The most important are late diagnosis, low socioeconomic status, and poor nutrition.[6],[7],[8] The lack of awareness at primary care level, universal health-care provision, and poor socioeconomic status lead to late presentations with advanced stage disease, thus influencing outcomes.

There is a scarcity of data on the clinical profile and outcomes of treatment of childhood NHL in India. Here, we present the experience in the management of childhood NHL from a single tertiary center in a large metropolitan urban setting, focusing specifically on the clinical profile and outcome of these children.


Methodology

Eligibility, staging, and diagnosis

The data of children younger than 15 years diagnosed with NHL at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, diagnosed with NHL over 6 years from August 2008 to June 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. The study was approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee. Twenty-six patients who had been diagnosed with NHL during this period were identified, and data regarding clinical features, diagnostic and staging workup, and treatment outcomes were collected.

The workup for all patients included a detailed history; physical examination; standard blood tests including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); computed tomography (CT) scan of the primary site along with neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis; and bone marrow (BM) aspiration and biopsy. NHL was staged according to St Jude/Murphy staging system[9] before treatment initiation.

The diagnosis was on the basis of either ultrasound or CT-guided core needle or excisional biopsy. The presence of neoplastic cells in the cerebrospinal fluid and the clinical sign of CNS involvement defined CNS disease. To evaluate malnutrition, the Z-scores were used for each patient's weight for age (undernutrition), height for age (stunting), and weight for height (wasting) (WHO Z-scores in children <5 href="https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_70_18#JR_10" xss=removed>10] and Indian Academy of Pediatrics Z-scores in children >5 years of age).[11]


Stratification

Therapy was stratified into three risk groups[3] according to the following criteria: risk Group 1 (R1) was defined as patients having lymphoma with initial complete resection; risk Group 2 (R2) was defined as patients diagnosed with lymphoma with no or incomplete resection and involvement of only extra-abdominal sites and LDH level <500>

Treatment

The patients were stratified by risk factors (stage and LDH level) and treated with the NHL-Berlin–Frankfurt–Münster (BFM 90) protocol.[3],[12] At diagnosis, all patients were treated with vigorous hydration and allopurinol to prevent tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). All patients received a cytoreductive phase with prednisone and cyclophosphamide. After the 5th day of prephase, the first course of chemotherapy was initiated the next day depending on the condition of the patient. In our patients' group, no one was in Group R1. Patients in Group R2 received four courses of multiagent chemotherapy (AA-BB-AA-BB). Patients in Group R3 received six courses, i.e., AA-BB-AA-BB-AA-BB. Conditions for starting the subsequent course of therapy were as follows: platelets >100,000/μL and neutrophils >1000/μL after the nadir of postchemotherapeutic cytopenia. The minimal interval between the two successive courses was at least 4 weeks.

Patients in risk groups R2 and R3 who had a residual tumor after two therapy courses received therapy course CC. Patients were re-evaluated after course CC. If no viable lymphoma tissue was found, therapy was continued with three more courses (AA-BB-CC).

Patients of lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) were treated with the International Network for Cancer Treatment and Research (INCTR), an unpublished study protocol for LBL/lymphoma and the MCP 841 protocol.


Response evaluation

Physical examination of all clinically documented sites of disease was performed prior to the initiation of each cycle. All patients underwent a CT scan of the neck, chest, and abdomen upfront. A CT or positron emission tomography (PET) scan study was performed after the first two cycles of chemotherapy. Follow-up evaluations included history, physical examination, and laboratory examinations every 3 months during the 1st year after the end of the therapy and at 4–6-month intervals during the following 3 years and yearly thereafter. PET or CT scans were performed when clinically indicated. Progression was defined as a recurrence of tumor documented by clinical examination, X-rays, ultrasound, and CT scan or PET scan studies. Patients with initial BM and CNS involvement were evaluated with punctures of BM and CNS until clearing of blasts. Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of clinical and radiological lesions. Disease progression was defined as increase by ≥25% of at least one measurable lesion, or by the appearance of a new lesion. Event-free survival (EFS) was determined as the time from the initiation of treatment to progression, death, or the most recent follow-up examination.


Statistical analysis

Data were statistically described as frequencies (number of cases) and percentages where appropriate. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the relative frequencies of age, sex, histopathologic types, and clinical and laboratory features. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparison was made using the log-rank test. P < 0>

Results

Patient characteristics and presentation

There were 26 patients of NHL who were treated at our center during the above period. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 7.7 years (2.5–13 years). There were 21 males. The presenting clinical characteristics of patients are shown in [Table 1]. The abdominal distension/lump was the most common presenting feature occurring in twenty patients (76.9%), followed by fever (73.1%), weight loss (46.2%), breathlessness (34.6%), pallor (34.6%), lymphadenopathy (26.9%), and bone pain (19.2%). The physical/radiological findings of the cohort are shown in [Table 2]. An abdominal mass (69.2%) was the most common finding. Pleural effusion was present in 46% of patients and about 19% of the patients presented with a superior mediastinum syndrome/superior vena cava syndrome.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics (presenting complaints) of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients

Characteristics

n (%)

Abdominal distension/lump

20 (76.9)

Fever

19 (73.1)

Weight loss

12 (46.2)

Breathlessness

9 (34.6)

Pallor

9 (34.6)

Lymphadenopathy

7 (26.9)

Bone pain

5 (19.2)

Abdominal pain

4 (15.4)

Facial swelling

4 (15.4)

Cough/dysphagia/vomiting

3 each

Pedal edema/voice change/chronic diarrhea

2 each

Bleeding manifestations/fecal/urinary

1 each

incontinence/jaundice

Table 2

Physical/radiological findings of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients

Disease localization and staging

Highly elevated serum LDH (LDH ≥1000 IU/L) was seen in 50% of patients. Nineteen patients (73.1%) were in Group R3 and seven patients (26.9%) were in R2 risk group. The primary presentation was extranodal in 57.7%, followed by nodal (26.9%) and combined (15.4%). The most common nodal presentation was cervical lymphadenopathy (46.2%), and the most common extranodal presentation was gastrointestinal tract (69.2%) followed by liver and BM (15.4

  • References

  1. Allen CE, Kamdar KY, Bollard CM, Gross TG. Malignant non-Hodgkin lymphomas in children. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 7th ed. Philadelphia Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016; 7: p. 587-603
  2.  Shende A. In: Lanzkowsky P, editor. Manual of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. 3rd ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press; 2000
  3.  Reiter A, Schrappe M, Tiemann M, Ludwig WD, Yakisan E, Zimmermann M. et alImproved treatment results in childhood B-cell neoplasms with tailored intensification of therapy: A report of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group trial NHL-BFM 90. Blood 1999; 94: 3294-306
  4.  Patte C, Auperin A, Michon J, Behrendt H, Leverger G, Frappaz D. et alThe Société Française D'oncologie Pédiatrique LMB89 protocol: Highly effective multiagent chemotherapy tailored to the tumor burden and initial response in 561 unselected children with B-cell lymphomas and L3 leukemia. Blood 2001; 97: 3370-9
  5.  Cairo MS, Sposto R, Perkins SL, Meadows AT, Hoover-Regan ML, Anderson JR. et alBurkitt's and Burkitt-like lymphoma in children and adolescents: A review of the children's cancer group experience. Br J Haematol 2003; 120: 660-70
  6.  van Hasselt EJ, Broadhead R. Burkitt's lymphoma: A case file study of 160 patients treated in Queen Elizabeth central hospital from 1988 to 1992. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1995; 12: 277-81
  7.  Ertem U, Duru F, Pamir A, Taçyildiz N, Daǧdemir A, Akçayöz A. et alBurkitt's lymphoma in 63 Turkish children diagnosed over a 10 year period. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1996; 13: 123-34
  8.  Hesseling PB. The SIOP Burkitt lymphoma pilot study in Malawi, Africa. Med Pediatr Oncol 2000; 34: 142
  9.  Murphy SB. Classification, staging and end results of treatment of childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Dissimilarities from lymphomas in adults. Semin Oncol 1980; 7: 332-9
  10.  WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006; 450: 76-85
  11.  Khadilkar V, Yadav S, Agrawal KK, Tamboli S, Banerjee M. et al.Indian Academy of Pediatrics Growth Charts Committee Revised IAP growth charts for height, weight and body mass index for 5- to 18-year-old Indian children. Indian Pediatr 2015; 52: 47-55
  12.  Reiter A, Schrappe M, Parwaresch R, Henze G, Müller-Weihrich S, Sauter S. et alNon-Hodgkin's lymphomas of childhood and adolescence: Results of a treatment stratified for biologic subtypes and stage – A report of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 359-72
  13.  Banerjee CK, Srinivas M, Goswami KC, Pathak IC, Walia BN. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in children – Histopathologic classification in relation to age and sex. Indian J Pediatr 1983; 50: 511-4
  14.  Wright D, McKeever P, Carter R. Childhood non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the United Kingdom: Findings from the UK children's cancer study group. J Clin Pathol 1997; 50: 128-34
  15.  Burkhardt B, Zimmermann M, Oschlies I, Niggli F, Mann G, Parwaresch R. et alThe impact of age and gender on biology, clinical features and treatment outcome of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in childhood and adolescence. Br J Haematol 2005; 131: 39-49
  16.  Fadoo Z, Belgaumi A, Alam M, Azam I, Naqvi A. Pediatric lymphoma: A 10-year experience at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2010; 32: e14-8
  17.  Manipadam MT, Nair S, Viswabandya A, Mathew L, Srivastava A, Chandy M. et alNon-Hodgkin lymphoma in childhood and adolescence: Frequency and distribution of immunomorphological types from a tertiary care center in South India. World J Pediatr 2011; 7: 318-25
  18.  Bharatnur SS, Amirtham U, Premalata CS, Kumar RV. Distribution of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents. A study from a regional cancer centre in South India. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2016; 15: 7-12
  19.  Srinivas V, Soman CS, Naresh KN. Study of the distribution of 289 non-Hodgkin lymphomas using the WHO classification among children and adolescents in India. Med Pediatr Oncol 2002; 39: 40-3
  20.  Advani S, Pai S, Adde M, Vaidya S, Vats T, Naresh K. et alPreliminary report of an intensified, short duration chemotherapy protocol for the treatment of pediatric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in India. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 893-7
  21.  Magrath IT. African Burkitt's lymphoma. History, biology, clinical features, and treatment. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1991; 13: 222-46
  22.  Sherief LM, Elsafy UR, Abdelkhalek ER, Kamal NM, Youssef DM, Elbehedy R. et alDisease patterns of pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A study from a developing area in Egypt. Mol Clin Oncol 2015; 3: 139-44
  23.  Hwang IG, Yoo KH, Lee SH, Park YH, Lim SC, Sinha S. et alClinicopathologic features and treatment outcomes in malignant lymphoma of pediatric and young adult patients in Korea: Comparison of Korean all-ages group and Western younger age group. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2007; 7: 580-6
  24.  Mobark NA, Tashkandi SA, Shakweer WA, Saidi KA, Fataftah S, Nemer NM. et alPediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A retrospective 7-year experience in children and adolescents with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated in King Fahad Medical City (KFMC). J Cancer Ther 2015; 6: 299-314
  25.  Gualco G, Klumb CE, Barber GN, Weiss LM, Bacchi CE. Pediatric lymphomas in Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2010; 65: 1267-77
  26.  Naresh KN, Srinivas V, Soman CS. Distribution of various subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in India: A study of 2773 lymphomas using R.E.A.L. And WHO classifications. Ann Oncol 2000; 11 Suppl 1: 63-7
  27.  Naresh KN, Agarwal B, Nathwani BN, Diebold J, McLennan KA, Muller-Hermelink KH. et alUse of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Mumbai, India: A review of 200 consecutive cases by a panel of five expert hematopathologists. Leuk Lymphoma 2004; 45: 1569-77
  28.  Naresh KN, Advani S, Adde M, Aziz Z, Banavali S, Bhatia K. et alReport of an international network of cancer treatment and research workshop on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in developing countries. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2004; 33: 330-7
  29.  Sasikala PS, Nirmala K, Sundersingh S, Mahji U, Rajkumar T. Frequency and distribution of Epstein-Barr virus infection and its association with P53 expression in a series of primary nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients from South India. Int J Lab Hematol 2010; 32: 56-64
  30.  Sehgal S, Mujtaba S, Gupta D, Aggarwal R, Marwaha RK. High incidence of Epstein Barr virus infection in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia: A preliminary study. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010; 53: 63-7
  31.  Sadananda Adiga MN, Chandy S, Ramachandra N, Appaji L, Aruna Kumari BS, Ramaswamy G. et alMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Indian J Cancer 2010; 47: 40-5
  32.  Nakagawa A, Nakamura S, Nakamine H, Yoshino T, Takimoto T, Horibe K. et alPathology review for paediatric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients in Japan; a report from the Japan Association of Childhood Leukaemia study (JACLS). Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 725-33
  33.  Oschlies I, Klapper W, Zimmermann M, Krams M, Wacker HH, Burkhardt B. et alDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma in pediatric patients belongs predominantly to the germinal-center type B-cell lymphomas: A clinicopathologic analysis of cases included in the German BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) multicenter trial. Blood 2006; 107: 4047-52
  34.  Perkins SL. Work-up and diagnosis of pediatric non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2000; 3: 374-90
  35.  Alavi S, Arzanian MT, Abbasian MR, Ashena Z. Tumor lysis syndrome in children with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006; 23: 65-70
  36.  Tiwari P, Thomas MK, Pathania S, Dhawan D, Gupta YK, Vishnubhatla S. et alSerum creatinine versus plasma methotrexate levels to predict toxicities in children receiving high-dose methotrexate. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2015; 32: 576-84
  37.  Seidemann K, Tiemann M, Schrappe M, Yakisan E, Simonitsch I, Janka-Schaub G, Sarin YK. et alShort-pulse B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma-type chemotherapy is efficacious treatment for pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A report of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group trial NHL-BFM 90. Blood 2001; 97: 3699-706
  38.  Link MP, Shuster JJ, Donaldson SS, Berard CW, Murphy SB. Treatment of children and young adults with early-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1259-66