Search

Recent Articles

IJMPO—A Journey of a Thousand Miles

Author : Padmaj S. Kulkarni

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment—T-Cells Hold the Key in Severe Cases

Author : Kunal Das, Nitika Agrawal, Mansi Kala, Rakhee Khanduri

Why Is China Importing COVID-19 Vaccine Now?

Author : Purvish M. Parikh

The Application of Scoring Systems in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for Onco-Hematological Patients Who Have Not Undergone Stem Cell Transplantation: A Cross-Sectional Study

CC BY 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2026; 47(04): 263-273

DOI: DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1814439

Abstract

Pediatric onco-hematological patients require intensive care due to the complexity of their conditions, aggressive disease progression, and the immunosuppressive effects of treatments like chemotherapy and immunotherapy, increasing their risk of life-threatening complications. This study aimed to assess and compare the performance of PRISM III (Paediatric Risk of Mortality 3), PRISM IV (Paediatric Risk of Mortality 4), PIM3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality 3), TISS (Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System), and pSOFA (Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) in onco-hematological patients after admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without a history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and to evaluate risk factors of mortality. We included 150 onco-hematological patients without prior stem cell transplantation admitted to PICU. Sociodemographic data, diagnosis, treatment, and causes of PICU admission were recorded. The average age was 7.2 ± 4.5 years, and 55.3% were male. Overall, 43.3% of patients survived. Nonsurvivors showed significantly higher PIM3, PRISM III, PRISM IV, pSOFA, and TISS ≥ 4 scores (p < 0.001). The pSOFA score demonstrated the highest sensitivity (87.1%), specificity (86.2%), and diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.946) for mortality prediction, followed by PIM3 (AUC: 0.862). Mortality was 56.7%, with pSOFA and PIM3 emerging as the most accurate predictors of outcomes.

Data Availability Statement

Data are accessible via a reasonable request directed to the corresponding author.

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by R.S.B.M., E.H.A.E., and S.A.M.M. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.I.A.F.R., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Patient Consent

All patients provided written informed consent.

Publication History

Article published online:
10 February 2026

© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Limited
A-13A, Graphix Tower 1, 6th floor, Sector 62, Noida 201309, Uttar Pradesh, India


Abstract

Pediatric onco-hematological patients require intensive care due to the complexity of their conditions, aggressive disease progression, and the immunosuppressive effects of treatments like chemotherapy and immunotherapy, increasing their risk of life-threatening complications. This study aimed to assess and compare the performance of PRISM III (Paediatric Risk of Mortality 3), PRISM IV (Paediatric Risk of Mortality 4), PIM3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality 3), TISS (Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System), and pSOFA (Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) in onco-hematological patients after admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without a history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and to evaluate risk factors of mortality. We included 150 onco-hematological patients without prior stem cell transplantation admitted to PICU. Sociodemographic data, diagnosis, treatment, and causes of PICU admission were recorded. The average age was 7.2 ± 4.5 years, and 55.3%. were male. Overall, 43.3%. of patients survived. Nonsurvivors showed significantly higher PIM3, PRISM III, PRISM IV, pSOFA, and TISS ≥ 4 scores (p < 0.001). The pSOFA score demonstrated the highest sensitivity (87.1%), specificity (86.2%), and diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.946) for mortality prediction, followed by PIM3 (AUC: 0.862). Mortality was 56.7%, with pSOFA and PIM3 emerging as the most accurate predictors of outcomes.

Introduction

Pediatric onco-hematological patients represent a vulnerable population requiring intensive medical management due to the complexities of their underlying conditions, including cancer and hematological disorders. These patients frequently have a higher risk of experiencing life-threatening consequences due to the aggressive nature of their disease, treatment regimens (such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy), and associated immunosuppressive effects.[1]

While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a common therapeutic intervention for certain hematological conditions, a significant proportion of onco-hematological patients do not undergo this procedure, due to either the nature of their disease or its contraindications. These patients may present with a range of complications, including but not limited to severe infections, multiorgan dysfunction, and treatment-related toxicity, all of which necessitate close monitoring and aggressive intervention in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting. Fewer studies have been conducted on the characteristics and outcomes of this subgroup of patients admitted to the PICU without a history of HSCT.[2]

The necessity for an accurate modified risk score for children undergoing stem cell transplantation led to the creation of a specialized risk assessment tool; however, an analogous prognostic instrument for the wider population of children with hemato-oncological diseases remains absent.[3] The latest advancements in medical and therapeutic interventions underscore the crucial need for accurate predictive systems. These models have multiple applications, including their use for benchmarking the efficacy of PICU services, the early identification of critically ill patients, and the optimization of resource allocation. This may result in an enhancement of care quality and patient safety, especially in low- and middle-income nations.[4]

The study assessed and compared PRISM III (Paediatric Risk of Mortality 3), PRISM IV (Paediatric Risk of Mortality 4), PIM3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality 3), TISS (Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System), and pSOFA (Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) performance and evaluated mortality risk factors in 150 onco-hematological patients admitted to the PICU without prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.


Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional analytic study was performed in an oncology center between September 2021 and September 2023. The Ethical Committee of the Pediatrics Department approved the study protocol. Patients or their guardians gave their consent before enrollment.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Pediatric patients under the age of 18 with onco-hematological malignancies requiring PICU admission and no prior history of HSCT participated in the study. Exclusion criteria comprised patients declared “do not resuscitate” by three attending consultants, patients admitted to the PICU for less than 24 hours, and those diagnosed with brain stem death.

Methods

Data collection was performed within the first 24 hours of PICU admission. Each case underwent a comprehensive assessment, including detailed history-taking, clinical examination, laboratory investigations, and imaging studies.

History and Clinical Assessment

A thorough history was obtained, documenting demographic data, family history, underlying disease, and causes of PICU admission. The treatment phase before PICU admission was categorized as untreated, newly diagnosed, or undergoing specific treatment phases such as induction, consolidation, maintenance, or reinduction in relapsed cases.

Clinical examination included vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, capillary refill time, oxygen saturation, temperature, and random blood glucose levels). The Glasgow Coma Scale Borgialli et al[5] was applied to assess neurological status. Signs of cardiac dysfunction, such as tachypnea, sinus tachycardia, hepatomegaly, and poor feeding in infants, were documented, along with symptoms of fatigue, exercise intolerance, and respiratory distress in older children. Fluid overload was monitored using pulmonary edema, liver enlargement, congested neck veins, and changes in body weight. It was quantitatively assessed using the formula:

[Total fluid input in 24 hours (mL) − total fluid output in 24 hours (mL)/weight at admission (g)] × 100.[6]

Additional assessments included the presence of complications such as neutropenic enterocolitis (typhlitis), disseminated intravascular coagulation, hepatic failure, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were evaluated according to KDIGO (Kidney Disease, Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines.[7]

Laboratory Investigations

Blood and urine samples were collected at admission and subsequently as required. Laboratory tests included a complete blood count, blood gases, and electrolyte levels (sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium). Kidney function (urea, creatinine) and liver function (alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, albumin) were assessed, along with coagulation parameters (prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, platelets concentration (PC), international normalized ratio). Additional tests, such as serum lactate, cardiac enzymes, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, and serum ferritin, were performed when clinically indicated. Blood, urine, and sputum cultures were obtained to identify infectious agents.

Imaging Studies

Routine imaging included chest X-rays and computed tomography scans of the chest. Echocardiography was performed before initiating chemotherapy and repeated if signs of heart failure or fluid overload were present. Pelvic–abdominal ultrasound was utilized to assess the bowel wall thickening in cases of typhlitis and evaluate organomegaly and ascites.

The five scoring systems (PRISM III, PRISM IV, PIM3, pSOFA, and TISS-76) were calculated based on data from the first 24 hours of PICU admission. The key physiological and laboratory components utilized by each score were summarized in [Table 1].


Table 1

Key components of the assessed scoring systems

Scoring System

Full name

Key assessed components

PRISM III

Pediatric Risk of Mortality III

Systolic BP, Diastolic BP, Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, GCS, Pupillary reflexes, pH, PaCO2, Bicarbonate, Potassium, Calcium, Glucose, BUN, Creatinine, WBC, Platelets, PT/PTT

PRISM IV

Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV

Similar to PRISM III with updated variable weights and coefficients

PIM3

Pediatric Index of Mortality 3

Systolic BP, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Base Excess, Pupillary reflexes, Elective/Urgency of admission, Recovery from surgery, Cancer diagnosis, Low risk diagnosis, High risk diagnosis

pSOFA

Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

Respiration (PaO2/FiO2), Coagulation (Platelets), Liver (Bilirubin), Cardiovascular (Hypotension/Vasoactive meds), CNS (GCS), Renal (Creatinine/Urine output)

TISS-76

Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System

Scores interventions (e.g., mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drips, frequent lab draws, renal replacement therapy) to quantify nursing workload and care intensity

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Normality was tested with Shapiro–Wilk test. Qualitative variables were shown as frequencies/percentages and compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for normal or median (range) for non-normal distributions. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05, highly significant at p < 0.001.


Ethical Approval

The Research Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, provided approval for the research protocol (code: MD-34-2021). The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2000. Written informed consent was procured from the patient’s guardian prior to their inclusion in the study, and from all patients.

Results

The average age of patients was 7.2 ± 4.5 years. A total of 55.3%. were males ([Table 2]).

Table 2

Underlying oncological diagnoses and primary reasons for pediatric intensive care unit admission

Characteristic

n = 150

Primary onco-hematological diagnoses and conditions

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

61 (40.7%)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

31 (20.7%)

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)

29 (19.3%)

Lymphoma

14 (9.3%)

Other tumors

15 (10%)

Primary reason for PICU admission

Metabolic causes and electrolyte disturbance

112 (74.7%)

Respiratory failure

102 (68%)

Septic shock

59 (39.3%)

Gastrointestinal and hepatic

47 (31.3%)

Hematological

47 (31.3%)

Central nervous

46 (30.7%)

Cardiovascular

37 (24.7%)

Acute kidney injury

11 (7.3%)

Abbreviation: PICU, pediatric intensive care unit.

Notes: Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Normality was tested with Shapiro–Wilk test. Qualitative variables were shown as frequencies/percentages and compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Quantitative data were presented as meanstandard deviation for normal or median (range) for non-normal distributions. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05, highly significant at p < 0>

[Table 3] shows the cardiovascular and respiratory assessment among the participants. Heart failure was present among 12.7%. of the participants. Almost all the participants (94%) did not have any symptoms of the severity of fluid overload. Nearly half of the participants (48.7%) had PARDS (Paediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome); of them, 52.1%. had severe PARDS. Also, 74%. of the participants need respiratory support; of them, 74.8%. need mechanical ventilation.

Table 3

Cardiovascular and respiratory assessment among the participants

Cardiovascular assessment

 Heart failure

19 (12.7%)

 Myocarditis

11 (7.3%)

 Cardiomyopathy

2 (1.3%)

 Inotropic drug administration

53 (35.3%)

 Number of inotropic drugs (n = 53)

2 (1–3)

Presence and severity of fluid overload

 No

141 (94%)

 Yes

5 (6%)

Respiratory assessment

PARDS

 No

77 (51.3%)

 Yes

73 (48.7%)

Severity of PARDS (n = 73)

 Mild

13 (17.8%)

 Moderate

22 (30.1%)

 Severe

38 (52.1%)

Respiratory support

 No

39 (26%)

 Yes

111 (74%)

Type of respiratory support (n = 111)

 Mechanical ventilation

83 (74.8%)

 High-velocity nasal insufflation

5 (4.5%)

 Oxygen mask

20 (18%)

 Nasal oxygen

3 (2.7%)

PaO2

 Mean ± SD

73.7 ± 24.8

 Median (range)

80 (21–100)

FiO2

 Mean ± SD

41.6 ± 18.2

 Median (range)

40 (21–121)

[Table 4] shows the neurological, gastrointestinal, and hematological assessments among the participants. A total of 25.3%. had signs suggestive of typhlitis; 39.3%. of the participants had septic shock.
Table 4

Neurological, gastrointestinal, and hematological assessment among the participants

Neurological assessment

 GCS*

 Mean ± SD

12.5 ± 3.4

 Median (range)

15 (3-15)

Pupils

 Round, regular, reactive

129 (86%)

 Dilated fixed pupils

11 (7.3%)

 Unequal pupils

10 (6.7%)

Gastrointestinal examination

 Typhlitis

38 (25.3%)

 Hepatic failure

4 (2.7%)

 Coagulation disorder

55 (36.7%)

 Septic shock

59 (39.3%)

KDIGO classification*

 Stage 1

5 (3.3%)

 Stage 2

3 (2%)

 Stage 3

2 (1.3%)

GCS, Glasgow coma scale; KDIGO, Kidney Disease, Improving Global Outcomes; SD, standard deviation.

[Table 5] shows the outcome among the studied group; 43.3%.of the participants were improved and still alive by the end of the study.
Table 5

Outcome among the studied group

Outcome

n = 150 (100%)

Nonsurvival

85 (56.7%)

Survival

65 (43.3%)

As shown in [Table 6], the clinical data revealed significant mortality patterns across conditions and admission causes. Septic shock demonstrated 100%. mortality among 59 cases, whereas respiratory failure showed 73.5%. mortality. Acute myeloid leukemia patients experienced higher mortality (74.2%) compared with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (55.7%). Metabolic disturbances, hematological complications, and gastrointestinal issues were associated with significantly elevated mortality rates, with p-values indicating statistical significance across multiple clinical parameters.
Table 6

Relation between diagnosis and causes of pediatric intensive care unit admission to outcome

Characteristics

n = 150

Dead (n = 85)

Improved (n = 65)

p-Value

Diagnosis

 ALL

61

34 (55.7%)

27 (44.3%)

0.850

 AML

31

23 (74.2%)

8 (25.8%)

0.027

 HLH

29

17 (58.6%)

12 (41.4%)

0.813

 Lymphoma

14

8 (57.1%)

6 (42.9%)

0.975

 Others

15

3 (20%)

12 (80%)

0.003

Treatment phase at the moment of PICU admission

 No

24

8 (33.3%)

16 (66.7%)

0.012

 Yes

126

77(61.1%)

49 (38.9%)

Causes of PICU admission

Metabolic causes and electrolyte disturbance

 No

38

13 (34.2%)

25 (65.8%)

0.001

 Yes

112

72 (64.3%)

40 (35.7%)

Septic shock

 No

91

26 (28.6%)

65 (71.4%)

<0>

 Yes

59

59 (100%)

0 (0%)

Hematological

 No

103

52 (50.5%)

51 (49.5%)

0.024

 Yes

47

33 (70.2%)

14 (29.8%)

Respiratory failure

 No

48

10 (20.8%)

38 (79.2%)

<0>

 Yes

102

75 (73.5%)

27 (26.5%)

Gastrointestinal and hepatic

 No

103

51 (49.5%)

52 (50.5%)

0.009

 Yes

47

34 (72.3%)

13 (27.7%)

Central nervous

 No

104

60 (57.7%)

44 (42.3%)

0.703

 Yes

46

25 (54.3%)

21 (45.7%)

Cardiovascular

 No

113

64 (56.6%)

49 (43.4%)

0.990

 Yes

37

21 (56.8%)

16 (43.2%)

Acute kidney injury

 No

139

78 (56.1%)

61 (43.9%)

0.628

 Yes

11

7 (63.6%)

4 (36.4%)

As shown in [Table 7], PIM3, PRISM III, PRISM IV, pSOFA, and class ≥ 4 TISS scores were significantly higher among children who died than among children who improved (p < 0.001).


Table 7

Relation between mortality scores and outcome of the participants

Dead (n = 85)

Improved (n = 65)

p-Value

Paediatric Index of Mortality score 3 (PIM3)

 Mean ± SD

38.14 ± 23.73

13.1 ± 28.6

<0>

 Median (range)

35.5 (3.8–95.1)

6.7 (0.2–20.2)

Paediatric risk of mortality (PRISM III)

 Mean ± SD

18 ± 6

10 ± 5

<0>

 Median (range)

19 (2-34)

9 (0–25)

Paediatric risk of mortality (PRISM IV) (%)

 Mean ± SD

42.9 ± 23.9

17.8 ± 13.8

<0>

 Median (range)

40 (5–98)

13 (3–77)

Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) 76

 <4>

6 (7.1%)

62 (95.4%)

<0>

 =4

79 (92.9%)

3 (4.6%)

Paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score

 Mean ± SD

11 ± 3

4 ± 2

<0>

 Median (range)

11 (3–18)

4 (0–11)

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

As shown in [Table 8], pSOFA score with cutoff point 6.5 had the highest sensitivity and specificity and the highest diagnostic accuracy in predicting outcome compared with other scores ([Fig. 1]).


Table 8

Diagnostic accuracy of PIM3, PRISM III PRISM IV, and pSOFA scores in predicting outcome using the receiver operating characteristic curve

Cutoff point

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

The area under the curve (95% CI)

p-Value

PIM3

12.3

80

81.5

0.862 (0.799–0.926)

<0>

PRISM III

11.5

84.7

69.2

0.843 (0.780–0.905)

<0>

PRISM IV

18

83.5

67.7

0.842 (0.780–0.906)

<0>

pSOFA

6.5

87.1

86.2

0.946 (0.913–0.979)

<0>

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, PIM3, Paediatric Index of Mortality score 3, PRISM III, Paediatric Risk of Mortality 3, PRISM IV, Paediatric Risk of Mortality 4, pSOFA, Paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.

Discussion

Due to the implementation of rigorous, combined treatment procedures that include chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation, and surgery, the prognosis for children with onco-hematological illnesses has improved dramatically over time. However, these intensive therapies can result in life-threatening complications. Severe infections are responsible for the hospitalization of up to 40%. of oncology patients in PICU.[7] Despite ongoing advancements in survival rates for these patients, their mortality remains higher compared with the general population.[8]

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of 150 PICU patients, aimed to assess and compared the performance of PRISM III, PRISM IV, PIM3, TISS, and pSOFA in onco-hematological patients after admission to the PICU without a history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and to evaluate the different risk factors of mortality in those patients.

The slight male predominance (55.3%) is consistent with the known epidemiological trends in pediatric oncology, where certain malignancies, such as leukemia, show a higher incidence in boys, and the average age was 7.2 years, with a wide range of 0.2 to 17 years. This aligns with previous studies, which report that pediatric onco-hematological patients are often young, with a slightly higher prevalence of male patients.[7]

Overall, the study reported a mortality rate of 56.7%. (85 patients), which is higher than the rates observed by Azevedo et al[9] who reported 41%. mortality. Also, Wu et al[10] who found observed mortality in 35.9%. among 155 children with acute leukemia. Additionally, Rubnitz et al[11] who reported 7.7%. mortality. Furthermore, Pechlaner et al[12] found that the mortality was present in 11%. of an Austrian cohort, including HSCT patients. These differences may be attributed to variations in the level of care across countries and delays in initiating induction therapy, potentially due to extended waiting lists in our region. Moreover, Pechlaner et al[12] attributed improved outcomes to advancements in intensive care interventions, such as the prompt administration of the sepsis treatment bundle, lung-protective ventilation strategies, and early initiation of extracorporeal therapies like continuous renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

In the present cohort study, respiratory failure (p < 0.001) and septic shock (p < 0.001) emerged as the primary determinants of PICU mortality, whereas metabolic and electrolyte disturbances (p = 0.001), gastrointestinal and hepatic complications (p = 0.009), and hematological issues (p = 0.024) also contributed substantially to adverse outcomes.

Notably, nonsurviving children exhibited markedly elevated TISS scores (above 4) compared with survivors (92.9 vs. 4.6%), underscoring that patients requiring more intensive interventions generally have more severe underlying illnesses.[13] Although not originally designed as a prognostic tool, the TISS score indirectly reflects illness severity, as more critically ill patients necessitate a broader and more intensive array of interventions.[14] [15] These observations are consistent with Ginter et al,[16] who demonstrated the utility of TISS and SOFA scores in estimating mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, Kao et al[17] reported that higher TISS scores are linked to longer intensive care unit stays and increased mortality risk.

Additionally, the TISS quantifies care intensity by assigning scores to specific therapeutic interventions,[18] alterations in hemodynamic parameters—such as blood pressure and heart rate—and the need for vasoactive drugs serve as clear markers of cardiovascular instability. This instability triggers advanced monitoring and interventions that are systematically integrated within the TISS framework.[19] [20] [21] Empirical evidence consistently shows that patients requiring continuous cardiovascular support, including inotropes or vasopressors, present with higher TISS scores,[22] which correlate with increased severity of illness, greater nursing workload, and higher resource utilization in intensive care settings.[23] [24]

Among the evaluated scoring systems, the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy for mortality prediction in our study (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.946). The elevated pSOFA scores are strongly associated with increased mortality risk, reflecting profound impairments in vital functions.[25] For instance, respiratory failure is quantified using oxygenation indices such as the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, with lower ratios indicating significant gas exchange impairment, as seen in acute respiratory distress syndrome.[26] [27] Moreover, the pSOFA score integrates cardiovascular parameters, including blood pressure and vasopressor requirements, to assess septic shock, collectively correlating with a higher probability of adverse outcomes.[28] [29] [30] [31]


 Fig 1:ROC curve for the diagnostic accuracy of PIM3, PRISM III, PRISM IV, and pSOFA in predicting outcome. PIM3, Pediatric Index of Mortality 3; pSOFA, Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; PRISM III, Paediatric Risk of Mortality 3; PRISM IV, Paediatric Risk of Mortality 4; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.


Furthermore, in the pSOFA scoring system, the neurological component is principally evaluated using the Glasgow Coma Scale,[32] which quantitatively assesses a patient's level of consciousness through responses in eye, verbal, and motor domains[33]; a decrease in the Glasgow Coma Scale reflects a significant impairment in central nervous system function and, consequently, contributes directly to a higher pSOFA score.[34] [35] Scientific studies have consistently demonstrated that diminished Glasgow Coma Scale values correlate with elevated mortality risk,[36] [37] thereby substantiating the prognostic relevance of neurological assessment in critical care.[38] Specifically, in pediatric populations, the lower Glasgow Coma Scale indicated worsened neurological status that proportionally raises the overall pSOFA score.[39] [40]

Within the pSOFA score, the hepatic component is assessed primarily through serum bilirubin levels, which directly indicate liver function.[41] Elevated bilirubin reflects impaired hepatic clearance, cholestasis, or hepatocellular injury, leading to higher pSOFA scores.[42] [43] [44] Evidence from pediatric critical care demonstrates that increased bilirubin levels correlate with worsening liver dysfunction, greater overall organ failure, and elevated mortality.[45] [46] In parallel, renal dysfunction is evaluated using serum creatinine and urine output[35] as critical markers of AKI.[47] Research consistently shows that abrupt declines in kidney function, as in AKI, reflected by elevated creatinine or diminished urine output[48] are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.[49] [50] Moreover, AKI often signals broader systemic derangements, frequently resulting from sepsis or multiorgan failure, which further worsen patient outcomes.[51] [52] Consequently, higher pSOFA scores driven by deteriorating hepatic and renal parameters underscore a more severe disease state and a greater risk of adverse clinical events.

It is important to note, however, that in pediatric oncology patients, thrombocytopenia may also result from cytotoxic chemotherapy, bone marrow suppression, or disease infiltration, rather than organ failure per se.[53] [54] Therefore, while a low platelet count contributes to higher pSOFA scores,[55] [56] its prognostic specificity for mortality in this subgroup may be attenuated. Adjusted or context-specific interpretations are warranted when applying the pSOFA score in children receiving chemotherapy.[57]

These findings align with Malik et al,[58] who observed that pSOFA's predictive accuracy improved from 81.6%. at admission to 90.8%. on day 3 and peaked at 97.4%. by day 7 (AUC: 0.77). Likewise, Maheshwari and Agarwal[59] reported an AUC of 0.882 for pSOFA in mortality prediction. Additionally, Wu et al[10] reported that pSOFA score had the greatest predictive validity for hospital mortality (AUC: 0.83), whereas Baloch et al[60] further substantiated its superior predictive validity for hospital and 30-day mortality, respectively.

In contrast, Rubnitz et al[11] reported suboptimal performance of the pSOFA score (AUC: 0.73 at 1 and 24 hours), attributing the lower accuracy to delayed attributable mortality from secondary infections or complications in ICU care. They hypothesized that pSOFA and PRISM III might perform better in pediatric oncology populations in low- or middle-income countries, where acute, nonsurvivable organ failure predominates.

Regarding the PIM3, our study demonstrated a robust predictive performance with an AUC of 0.862. The PIM3 score has been extensively validated as a prognostic tool for estimating mortality risk in PICUs.[61] Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that elevated PIM3 scores are closely linked to a heightened risk of mortality, thereby reflecting the aggregate burden of critical illness. Severe conditions, such as respiratory failure and septic shock, which result in marked hypoxemia and systemic inflammatory responses, are key factors contributing to increased PIM3 scores.[4] [62] Similarly, disturbances in metabolic and electrolyte balance, as well as hematological irregularities, serve as indicators of multiorgan dysfunction that further deteriorate the clinical prognosis.[63] [64] In support of these findings, Buranapattama et al[65] reported a discriminative ability for mortality prediction with an AUC of 0.804 using the PIM3 score, whereas Jiménez-Texcalpaa et al[66] documented an acceptable performance with an AUC of 0.77.

The PIM3 score, while not directly incorporating the Glasgow Coma Scale, relies significantly on the patient's neurological status. A low Glasgow Coma Scale, indicative of depressed consciousness,[67] is commonly associated with neurological dysfunction[34] that contribute to increase mortality risk in PICU.[68] Moreover, the need for mechanical ventilation serves as an indicator of severe respiratory injury and elevated mortality risk.[69] [70] Clinical studies consistently show that patients requiring ventilation face a significantly higher risk of death,[71] which contributes to higher PIM3 score as the risk of mortality correlated with PIM3 score.[72]

Nonsurvivors in our cohort also exhibited significantly higher PRISM III and PRISM IV scores compared with survivors, with AUCs of 0.843 and 0.842, respectively—the latter demonstrating an optimal cutoff value of 18. The metabolic disturbances—such as acid–base imbalances reflected by aberrant pH and bicarbonate levels—and electrolyte abnormalities, characterized by deviations in sodium, potassium, and other essential ions, indicate underlying cellular dysfunction and systemic stress.[73] [74] Empirical evidence consistently associates these pronounced deviations with increased PRISM scores, which in turn correlate strongly with heightened mortality risk.[75] [76] In support of these findings, Anjali et al[77] reported that elevated PRISM scores are linked to increased mortality and serve as an excellent predictor of both mortality and illness severity (AUC: 0.99). This observation was further corroborated by Azevedo et al,[9] who noted that survivors exhibited significantly lower PRISM IV scores compared with nonsurvivors (10.9 vs. 14.1). Similarly, Muthupandi et al[78] demonstrated that the PRISM III score effectively predicts mortality risk in patients requiring PICU admission, achieving an AUC of 0.881, whereas Srinivas et al[79] reported robust discriminatory performance of the PRISM III score for mortality prediction in a South Indian tertiary care PICU setting (AUC: 0.888).

Conversely, Wittmann et al,[8] in a cohort of 233 children with hemato-oncological diseases or poststem cell transplant, reported limited predictive accuracy of the PRISM III score (AUC: 0.78) among children admitted to the PICU with sepsis, potentially due to the inclusion of both hemato-oncological and posttransplant patients. Also, Rubnitz et al[11] observed that the PRISM III score performed poorly in predicting mortality among pediatric patients receiving conventional cancer therapy in the ICU.

Abnormal elevations in creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) serve as indicators of AKI which heighten overall illness severity.[80] Research consistently shows that higher creatinine and BUN levels independently correlate with increased mortality risk in PICU,[81] [82] [83] which results in higher the PRISM III score.[77]

In our study, the pSOFA and PIM3 scores demonstrated the highest predictive accuracies for mortality, with AUCs of 0.946 and 0.862, respectively, followed by PRISM III (AUC: 0.843) and PRISM IV (AUC: 0.842). Notably, PIM3 is the sole score incorporating hematological malignancies, with very high-risk diagnoses—including cardiac arrest, severe combined immunodeficiency, leukemia or lymphoma, bone marrow transplant recipients, and liver failure—integral to its framework.[4] These findings align with those of Srinivas et al,[79] who, in a single-center prospective study of 214 PICU patients in South India, demonstrated that the PIM3 score (AUC: 0.934) provided superior mortality discrimination compared with PRISM III (AUC: 0.888). Further supporting our results, Agrwal et al[84] reported that the pSOFA score exhibited a better predictive ability for PICU mortality than PRISM III, whereas Angurana et al[85] highlighted the enhanced accuracy of pSOFA over PRISM III. Additionally, Baloch et al[60] noted that the pSOFA score is an effective predictor of 30-day mortality in critically ill children, outperforming PRISM III in this regard.

This study is limited by its observational design, which validates pSOFA and PIM3 as mortality predictors but does not establish causal impact on outcomes. Future research should pursue prospective interventional trials to evaluate whether applying these scores in real-time care, including escalation or goals-of-care discussions, can improve clinical outcomes across diverse settings. We did not incorporate advanced hemodynamic monitoring data, such as inferior vena cava status, point-of-care echocardiography, or dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness (e.g., Pulsatility Index, Pleth Variability Index). The potential added prognostic value of these advanced parameters in conjunction with established scores represents an important avenue for future prospective research.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Data Availability Statement

Data are accessible via a reasonable request directed to the corresponding author.

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by R.S.B.M., E.H.A.E., and S.A.M.M. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.I.A.F.R., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Patient Consent

All patients provided written informed consent.




References

  1. 1-Wedekind MF, Denton NL, Chen C-Y, Cripe TP. Pediatric cancer immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges. Paediatr Drugs 2018; 20 (05) 395-408
  2. 2-Pillon M, Sperotto F, Zattarin E. et al. Predictors of mortality after admission to pediatric intensive care unit in oncohematologic patients without history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66 (10) e27892
  3. 3-Yang H, Xun Y, Shen Y. et al. A simplified and robust risk stratification model for stem cell transplantation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5 (10) 101762
  4. 4-Rahmatinejad Z, Rahmatinejad F, Sezavar M, Tohidinezhad F, Abu-Hanna A, Eslami S. Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). BMC Pediatr 2022; 22 (01) 199
  5. 5-Borgialli DA, Mahajan P, Hoyle Jr JD. et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Performance of the pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale score in the evaluation of children with blunt head trauma. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23 (08) 878-884
  6. 6-Goldstein SL, Currier H, Graf Cd, Cosio CC, Brewer ED, Sachdeva R. Outcome in children receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (06) 1309-1312
  7. 7-Bhosale SJ, Joshi M, Patil VP. et al. Epidemiology and predictors of hospital outcomes of critically ill pediatric oncology patients: a retrospective study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25 (10) 1183-1188
  8. 8-Wittmann Dayagi T, Nirel R, Avrahami G. et al. A need for a novel survival risk scoring system for intensive care admissions due to sepsis in pediatric hematology/oncology patients. J Intensive Care Med 2024; 39 (05) 484-492
  9. 9-Azevedo RT, Araujo OR, Petrilli AS, Silva DCB. Children with malignancies and septic shock - an attempt to understand the risk factors. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2023; 99 (02) 127-132
  10. 10-Wu L, Jin M, Wang R. et al. Prognostic factors of sepsis in children with acute leukemia admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70 (09) e30382
  11. 11-Rubnitz Z, Sun Y, Agulnik A. et al. Prediction of attributable mortality in pediatric patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit for suspected infection: a comprehensive evaluation of risk scores. Cancer Med 2023; 12 (23) 21287-21292
  12. 12-Pechlaner A, Kropshofer G, Crazzolara R, Hetzer B, Pechlaner R, Cortina G. Mortality of hemato-oncologic patients admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit: a single-center experience. Front Pediatr 2022; 10: 795158
  13. 13-Handelsman Y, Butler J, Bakris GL. et al. Early intervention and intensive management of patients with diabetes, cardiorenal, and metabolic diseases. J Diabetes Complications 2023; 37 (02) 108389
  14. 14-Schallner N, Lieberum J, Kalbhenn J, Bürkle H, Daumann F. Intensive care unit resources and patient-centred outcomes in severe COVID-19: a prospective single-centre economic evaluation. Anaesthesia 2022; 77 (12) 1336-1345
  15. 15-Dünser MW, Noitz M, Tschoellitsch T. et al. Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2024; 136 (23-24): 651-661
  16. 16-Ginter K, Schwab F, Behnke M. et al. SAPS2, APACHE2, SOFA, and Core-10-TISS upon admission as risk indicators for ICU-acquired infections: a retrospective cohort study. Infection 2023; 51 (04) 993-1001
  17. 17-Kao K-D, Lee SKC, Liu C-Y, Chou N-K. Risk factors associated with longer stays in cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit after CABG. J Formos Med Assoc 2022; 121 (1 Pt 2): 304-313
  18. 18-Kaufmann I, Briegel J. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS)-a method for calculating costs in the intensive care unit (ICU) and intermediate care unit (IMCU). Crit Care 2000; 4: 243
  19. 19-Kao C-C, Tseng C-H, Lo M-T. et al. Alteration autonomic control of cardiac function during hemodialysis predict cardiovascular outcomes in end stage renal disease patients. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 18783
  20. 20-Bragard I, Servotte J-C, VAN CAUWENBERGE I. et al. Breaking bad news in the emergency department: a randomized controlled study of a training using role-play simulation. Crit Care 2018; •••: 22
  21. 21-Kakavas S, Chalkias A, Xanthos T. Vasoactive support in the optimization of post-cardiac arrest hemodynamic status: from pharmacology to clinical practice. Eur J Pharmacol 2011; 667 (1-3): 32-40
  22. 22-Walsh R, Boyer C, LaCorte J. et al. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels in pediatric patients with congestive heart failure undergoing cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135 (01) 98-105
  23. 23-Miranda DR, Nap R, de Rijk A, Schaufeli W, Iapichino G. TISS Working Group. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. Nursing activities score. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 (02) 374-382
  24. 24-Padilha KG, Sousa RMC, Kimura M. et al. Nursing workload in intensive care units: a study using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28). Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007; 23 (03) 162-169
  25. 25-Balamuth F, Scott HF, Weiss SL. et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) PED Screen and PECARN Registry Study Groups. Validation of the pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score and evaluation of third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock definitions in the pediatric emergency department. JAMA Pediatr 2022; 176 (07) 672-678
  26. 26-Helms J, Catoire P, Abensur Vuillaume L. et al. Oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: guidelines from the SRLF-SFMU consensus conference. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14 (01) 140
  27. 27-Mamdouh OM, Ahmed AES, Hashem AZA, Elshahaat HA. Performance of different dynamic oxygenation indices incorporating heart rate to predict non-invasive ventilation outcomes in hypoxemic respiratory failure. Egypt J Bronchol 2024; 18 (01) 103
  28. 28-Lee HJ, Ko BS, Ryoo SM. et al; Korean Shock Society. Modified cardiovascular SOFA score in sepsis: development and internal and external validation. BMC Med 2022; 20 (01) 263
  29. 29-Kim DS, Park JE, Hwang SY. et al. Prediction of vasopressor requirement among hypotensive patients with suspected infection: usefulness of diastolic shock index and lactate. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2022; 9 (03) 176-186
  30. 30-Kim TH, Jeong D, Park JE. et al; Korean Shock Society. Prognostic accuracy of initial and 24-h maximum SOFA scores of septic shock patients in the emergency department. Heliyon 2023; 9 (09) e19480
  31. 31-Park H, Lee J, Oh DK. et al; Korean Sepsis Alliance (KSA) Investigators. Serial evaluation of the serum lactate level with the SOFA score to predict mortality in patients with sepsis. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 6351
  32. 32-Alalawi MSM, Aljabran HAM, Alkhamri AM. et al. Glasgow Coma Scale in anticipation of sepsis and septic shock. Egypt J Hosp Med 2017; 69 (06) 2663-2666
  33. 33-Agrawal S. The Glasgow Coma Scale: a breakthrough in the assessment of the level of consciousness. J Tradit Med Clin Naturop 2018; 7 (02) 273
  34. 34-Chen L, Lu L, Fang Y. et al. Glasgow Coma Scale on admission as predictor of neurological sequelae at discharge and acute respiratory failure in patients with heatstroke. Postgrad Med J 2023; 99 (1178) 1237-1245
  35. 35-Sayed AS, Abd El Haie O, Shehata A. Sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA] score in the pediatric intensive care unit. Benha J Appl Sci. 2018; 3 (02) 5-11
  36. 36-Moghaddam NM, Fathi M, Jame SZB, Darvishi M, Mortazavi M. Association of Glasgow coma scale and endotracheal intubation in predicting mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Acute Crit Care 2023; 38 (01) 113-121
  37. 37-Huang Y-T, Huang Y-H, Hsieh C-H, Li C-J, Chiu I-M. Comparison of injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and revised trauma score in predicting the mortality and prolonged ICU stay of traumatic young children: A cross-sectional retrospective study. Emerg Med Int 2019; 2019 (01) 5453624
  38. 38-Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A. et al. Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2013; 39 (03) 285-292
  39. 39-Lalitha AV, Satish JK, Reddy M, Ghosh S, George J, Pujari C. Sequential organ failure assessment score as a predictor of outcome in sepsis in pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2021; 10 (02) 110-117
  40. 40-Hata M, Takahara M, Kubo F. et al. Association of the glasgow coma scale with the length of hospital stay in patients with thyroid storm. Intern Med 2025; 64 (15) 2270-2275
  41. 41-Karampela I, Dalamaga M. Serum bilirubin to fetuin-A ratio as a prognostic biomarker in critically ill patients with sepsis. Metab Open 2021; 10: 100094
  42. 42-Zhao D, Wu GY. Prolonged direct hyperbilirubinemia following acute hepatitis: when not to worry?. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2024; 12 (12) 985-987
  43. 43-Lei Y, Lu X, Duan X, Tang W, Wang Q. Bilirubin is a superior biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and for differential diagnosis of benign liver disease. J Lab Med 2023; 47 (05) 233-241
  44. 44-Ramírez-Mejía MM, Castillo-Castañeda SM, Pal SC, Qi X, Méndez-Sánchez N. The multifaceted role of bilirubin in liver disease: a literature review. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2024; 12 (11) 939-948
  45. 45-Patel JJ, Taneja A, Niccum D, Kumar G, Jacobs E, Nanchal R. The association of serum bilirubin levels on the outcomes of severe sepsis. J Intensive Care Med 2015; 30 (01) 23-29
  46. 46-Lee M, Jang M, Jo J. et al. Hyperbilirubinemia as a risk factor for mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (13) 4203
  47. 47-Ostermann M, Legrand M, Meersch M, Srisawat N, Zarbock A, Kellum JA. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14 (01) 145
  48. 48-Priyanka P, Zarbock A, Izawa J, Gleason TG, Renfurm RW, Kellum JA. The impact of acute kidney injury by serum creatinine or urine output criteria on major adverse kidney events in cardiac surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162 (01) 143-151.e7
  49. 49-Rehou S, Jeschke MG. Admission creatinine is associated with poor outcomes in burn patients. Burns 2022; 48 (06) 1355-1363
  50. 50-Li L, Zhang Z, Xiong Y. et al. Relationship between initial urine output and mortality in patients hospitalized in cardiovascular intensive care units: More is not better. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 853217
  51. 52-Dellepiane S, Marengo M, Cantaluppi V. Detrimental cross-talk between sepsis and acute kidney injury: new pathogenic mechanisms, early biomarkers and targeted therapies. Crit Care 2016; 20: 61
  52. 53-Periayah MH, Halim AS, Mat Saad AZ. Mechanism action of platelets and crucial blood coagulation pathways in hemostasis. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res 2017; 11 (04) 319-327
  53. 54-Zhang R, Liu Y, Zhang B. et al. Coagulopathy is associated with multiple organ damage and prognosis of COVID-19. EXCLI J 2021; 20: 174-191
  54. 55-Matics TJ, Sanchez-Pinto LN. Adaptation and validation of a pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score and evaluation of the sepsis-3 definitions in critically ill children. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (10) e172352-e172352
  55. 56-Schlapbach LJ, Straney L, Bellomo R, MacLaren G, Pilcher D. Prognostic accuracy of age-adapted SOFA, SIRS, PELOD-2, and qSOFA for in-hospital mortality among children with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44 (02) 179-188
  56. 57-Yuan Y, Wang G, Chen X. et al. Thrombocytopenia and increased risk of adverse outcome in COVID-19 patients. PeerJ 2022; 10: e13608
  57. 58-Malik A, Taksande A, Meshram R. Pediatric sequential organ assessment score: a comprehensive review of the prognostic marker in the pediatric intensive care unit. Cureus 2024; 16 (05) e60034
  58. 59-Maheshwari N, Agarwal N. The role of pediatric sequential organ failure assessment lactate score in predicting the clinical outcome of critically ill children: a single-center, prospective, observational study. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2023; 10 (05) 193-198
  59. 60-Baloch SH, Shaikh I, Gowa MA, Lohano PD, Ibrahim MN. Comparison of pediatric sequential organ failure assessment and pediatric risk of mortality III score as mortality prediction in pediatric intensive care unit. Cureus 2022; 14 (01) e21055
  60. 61-Arslan G, Besci T, Özdemir G. et al. Predictive value of PRISM-4, PIM-3, CRP, albumin, CRP/albumin ratio and lactate in critically ill children. Children (Basel) 2023; 10 (11) 1731
  61. 62-Huo Z, Booth J, Monks T. et al. Dynamic mortality prediction in critically Ill children during interhospital transports to PICUs using explainable AI. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 108
  62. 63-Zieg J, Ghose S, Raina R. Electrolyte disorders related emergencies in children. BMC Nephrol 2024; 25 (01) 282
  63. 64-Berta DM, Teketelew BB, Chane E. et al. Hematological changes in women with cervical cancer before and after cancer treatment: retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 27630
  64. 65-Buranapattama T, Phumeetham S, Piyaphanee N, Sukharomana M, Charuvanij S. Mortality in children and adolescents with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2025; 23 (01) 20
  65. 66-Camarena-Vielma L, Lona-Reyes JC, Vázquez-Bojórquez MS. et al. Implementation of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 and the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in an intensive care unit in Mexico. Arch Argent Pediatr 2022; 120 (05) 332-335
  66. 67-Iyanna N, Donohue JK, Lorence JM. et al. Early Glasgow coma scale score and prediction of traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis of three harmonized prehospital randomized clinical trials. Prehosp Emerg Care 2024; 24: 1-9
  67. 68-Molla MT, Endeshaw AS, Kumie FT, Lakew TJ. The magnitude of pediatric mortality and determinant factors in intensive care units in a low-resource country, Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10: 1117497
  68. 69-Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW. et al; PROVE Network Investigators. Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44 (11) 1914-1922
  69. 70Abrams D, Schmidt M, Pham T. et al. Mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome during extracorporeal life support. Research and practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201 (05) 514-525
  70. 71-Marti S, Carsin A-E, Sampol J. et al. Higher mortality and intubation rate in COVID-19 patients treated with noninvasive ventilation compared with high-flow oxygen or CPAP. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 6527
  71. 72-Nasser MM, Al-Sawah AY, Hablas WR, Mansour AM. Reliability of pediatric risk of mortality III (PRISM III) and pediatric index of mortality 3 (PIM3) scores in the pediatric intensive care unit of El-Hussein University Hospital. Al-Azhar J Pediatr. 2020; 23 (03) 1048-1071
  72. 73-Crintea IN, Cindrea AC, Mederle OA, Trebuian CI, Timar R. Electrolyte imbalances and metabolic emergencies in obesity: mechanisms and clinical implications. Diseases 2025; 13 (03) 69
  73. 74-Iheagwam FN, Joseph AJ, Adedoyin ED, Iheagwam OT, Ejoh SA. Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetes: shedding light on a widespread oversight. Pathophysiology 2025; 32 (01) 9
  74. 75-Botan E, Gün E, Şden EK. et al. Characteristics and timing of mortality in children dying in pediatric intensive care: a 5-year experience. Acute Crit Care 2022; 37 (04) 644-653
  75. 76-Im Y, Park HY, Lee J-Y. et al. Impact of preserved ratio impaired spirometry on coronary artery calcium score progression: a longitudinal cohort study. ERJ Open Res 2024; 10 (01) 1-10
  76. 77-Anjali M, Unnikrishnan DT. Effectiveness of PRISM III score in predicting the severity of illness and mortality of children admitted to pediatric intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study. Gaz Egypt Paediatr Assoc 2023; 71 (01) 25
  77. 78-Muthupandi V, Dianagrace R, Narayanan E, Sathya J. Comparison of PRISM III and PIM II score in predicting mortality in paediatric intensive care unit: an observational study. J Clin Diagn Res 2022; 16 (02) 8-12
  78. 79-Srinivas N, Venugopal K, Venkatesha GA, Chidanand N. Comparison of Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM III) score with Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM III) score in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: a single center, prospective observational study from South India. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2024; 11 (05) 208-212
  79. 80-Kellum JA, Romagnani P, Ashuntantang G, Ronco C, Zarbock A, Anders H-J. Acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7 (01) 52
  80. 81-Tatlisu MA, Kaya A, Keskin M. et al. The association of blood urea nitrogen levels with mortality in acute pulmonary embolism. J Crit Care 2017; 39: 248-253
  81. 82-Cakar MA, Gunduz H, Vatan MB, Kocayigit I, Akdemir R. The effect of admission creatinine levels on one-year mortality in acute myocardial infarction. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012 (01) 186495
  82. 83-Luo H, Yang X, Chen K, Lan S, Liao G, Xu J. Blood creatinine and urea nitrogen at ICU admission and the risk of in-hospital death and 1-year mortality in patients with intracranial hemorrhage. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 967614
  83. 84-Agrwal S, Saxena R, Jha M, Jhamb U, Pallavi. Comparison of pSOFA with PRISM III and PIM 2 as predictors of outcome in a tertiary care pediatric ICU: a prospective cross-sectional study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024; 28 (08) 796-801
  84. 85-Angurana SK, Dhaliwal MS, Choudhary A. Unified severity and organ dysfunction scoring system in pediatric intensive care unit: a pressing priority. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2023; 10 (05) 181-183
  85. 86-Selewski DT, Cornell TT, Heung M. et al. Validation of the KDIGO acute kidney injury criteria in a pediatric critical care population. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40 (10) 1481-1488

 Fig 1:ROC curve for the diagnostic accuracy of PIM3, PRISM III, PRISM IV, and pSOFA in predicting outcome. PIM3, Pediatric Index of Mortality 3; pSOFA, Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; PRISM III, Paediatric Risk of Mortality 3; PRISM IV, Paediatric Risk of Mortality 4; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

References

  1. Wedekind MF, Denton NL, Chen C-Y, Cripe TP. Pediatric cancer immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges. Paediatr Drugs 2018; 20 (05) 395-408
  2. Pillon M, Sperotto F, Zattarin E. et al. Predictors of mortality after admission to pediatric intensive care unit in oncohematologic patients without history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66 (10) e27892
  3. Yang H, Xun Y, Shen Y. et al. A simplified and robust risk stratification model for stem cell transplantation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5 (10) 101762
  4. Rahmatinejad Z, Rahmatinejad F, Sezavar M, Tohidinezhad F, Abu-Hanna A, Eslami S. Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). BMC Pediatr 2022; 22 (01) 199
  5. Borgialli DA, Mahajan P, Hoyle Jr JD. et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Performance of the pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale score in the evaluation of children with blunt head trauma. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23 (08) 878-884
  6. Goldstein SL, Currier H, Graf Cd, Cosio CC, Brewer ED, Sachdeva R. Outcome in children receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (06) 1309-1312
  7. Bhosale SJ, Joshi M, Patil VP. et al. Epidemiology and predictors of hospital outcomes of critically ill pediatric oncology patients: a retrospective study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25 (10) 1183-1188
  8. Wittmann Dayagi T, Nirel R, Avrahami G. et al. A need for a novel survival risk scoring system for intensive care admissions due to sepsis in pediatric hematology/oncology patients. J Intensive Care Med 2024; 39 (05) 484-492
  9. Azevedo RT, Araujo OR, Petrilli AS, Silva DCB. Children with malignancies and septic shock - an attempt to understand the risk factors. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2023; 99 (02) 127-132
  10. Wu L, Jin M, Wang R. et al. Prognostic factors of sepsis in children with acute leukemia admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70 (09) e30382
  11. Rubnitz Z, Sun Y, Agulnik A. et al. Prediction of attributable mortality in pediatric patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit for suspected infection: a comprehensive evaluation of risk scores. Cancer Med 2023; 12 (23) 21287-21292
  12. Pechlaner A, Kropshofer G, Crazzolara R, Hetzer B, Pechlaner R, Cortina G. Mortality of hemato-oncologic patients admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit: a single-center experience. Front Pediatr 2022; 10: 795158
  13. Handelsman Y, Butler J, Bakris GL. et al. Early intervention and intensive management of patients with diabetes, cardiorenal, and metabolic diseases. J Diabetes Complications 2023; 37 (02) 108389
  14. Schallner N, Lieberum J, Kalbhenn J, Bürkle H, Daumann F. Intensive care unit resources and patient-centred outcomes in severe COVID-19: a prospective single-centre economic evaluation. Anaesthesia 2022; 77 (12) 1336-1345
  15. Dünser MW, Noitz M, Tschoellitsch T. et al. Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2024; 136 (23-24): 651-661
  16. Ginter K, Schwab F, Behnke M. et al. SAPS2, APACHE2, SOFA, and Core-10-TISS upon admission as risk indicators for ICU-acquired infections: a retrospective cohort study. Infection 2023; 51 (04) 993-1001
  17. Kao K-D, Lee SKC, Liu C-Y, Chou N-K. Risk factors associated with longer stays in cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit after CABG. J Formos Med Assoc 2022; 121 (1 Pt 2): 304-313
  18. Kaufmann I, Briegel J. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS)-a method for calculating costs in the intensive care unit (ICU) and intermediate care unit (IMCU). Crit Care 2000; 4: 243
  19. Kao C-C, Tseng C-H, Lo M-T. et al. Alteration autonomic control of cardiac function during hemodialysis predict cardiovascular outcomes in end stage renal disease patients. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 18783
  20. Bragard I, Servotte J-C, VAN CAUWENBERGE I. et al. Breaking bad news in the emergency department: a randomized controlled study of a training using role-play simulation. Crit Care 2018; •••: 22
  21. Kakavas S, Chalkias A, Xanthos T. Vasoactive support in the optimization of post-cardiac arrest hemodynamic status: from pharmacology to clinical practice. Eur J Pharmacol 2011; 667 (1-3): 32-40
  22. Walsh R, Boyer C, LaCorte J. et al. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels in pediatric patients with congestive heart failure undergoing cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135 (01) 98-105
  23. Miranda DR, Nap R, de Rijk A, Schaufeli W, Iapichino G. TISS Working Group. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. Nursing activities score. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 (02) 374-382
  24. Padilha KG, Sousa RMC, Kimura M. et al. Nursing workload in intensive care units: a study using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28). Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007; 23 (03) 162-169
  25. Balamuth F, Scott HF, Weiss SL. et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) PED Screen and PECARN Registry Study Groups. Validation of the pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score and evaluation of third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock definitions in the pediatric emergency department. JAMA Pediatr 2022; 176 (07) 672-678
  26. Helms J, Catoire P, Abensur Vuillaume L. et al. Oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: guidelines from the SRLF-SFMU consensus conference. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14 (01) 140
  27. Mamdouh OM, Ahmed AES, Hashem AZA, Elshahaat HA. Performance of different dynamic oxygenation indices incorporating heart rate to predict non-invasive ventilation outcomes in hypoxemic respiratory failure. Egypt J Bronchol 2024; 18 (01) 103
  28. Lee HJ, Ko BS, Ryoo SM. et al; Korean Shock Society. Modified cardiovascular SOFA score in sepsis: development and internal and external validation. BMC Med 2022; 20 (01) 263
  29. Kim DS, Park JE, Hwang SY. et al. Prediction of vasopressor requirement among hypotensive patients with suspected infection: usefulness of diastolic shock index and lactate. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2022; 9 (03) 176-186
  30. Kim TH, Jeong D, Park JE. et al; Korean Shock Society. Prognostic accuracy of initial and 24-h maximum SOFA scores of septic shock patients in the emergency department. Heliyon 2023; 9 (09) e19480
  31. Park H, Lee J, Oh DK. et al; Korean Sepsis Alliance (KSA) Investigators. Serial evaluation of the serum lactate level with the SOFA score to predict mortality in patients with sepsis. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 6351
  32. Alalawi MSM, Aljabran HAM, Alkhamri AM. et al. Glasgow Coma Scale in anticipation of sepsis and septic shock. Egypt J Hosp Med 2017; 69 (06) 2663-2666
  33. Agrawal S. The Glasgow Coma Scale: a breakthrough in the assessment of the level of consciousness. J Tradit Med Clin Naturop 2018; 7 (02) 273
  34. Chen L, Lu L, Fang Y. et al. Glasgow Coma Scale on admission as predictor of neurological sequelae at discharge and acute respiratory failure in patients with heatstroke. Postgrad Med J 2023; 99 (1178) 1237-1245
  35. Sayed AS, Abd El Haie O, Shehata A. Sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA] score in the pediatric intensive care unit. Benha J Appl Sci. 2018; 3 (02) 5-11
  36. Moghaddam NM, Fathi M, Jame SZB, Darvishi M, Mortazavi M. Association of Glasgow coma scale and endotracheal intubation in predicting mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Acute Crit Care 2023; 38 (01) 113-121
  37. Huang Y-T, Huang Y-H, Hsieh C-H, Li C-J, Chiu I-M. Comparison of injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and revised trauma score in predicting the mortality and prolonged ICU stay of traumatic young children: A cross-sectional retrospective study. Emerg Med Int 2019; 2019 (01) 5453624
  38. Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A. et al. Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2013; 39 (03) 285-292
  39. Lalitha AV, Satish JK, Reddy M, Ghosh S, George J, Pujari C. Sequential organ failure assessment score as a predictor of outcome in sepsis in pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2021; 10 (02) 110-117
  40. Hata M, Takahara M, Kubo F. et al. Association of the glasgow coma scale with the length of hospital stay in patients with thyroid storm. Intern Med 2025; 64 (15) 2270-2275
  41. Karampela I, Dalamaga M. Serum bilirubin to fetuin-A ratio as a prognostic biomarker in critically ill patients with sepsis. Metab Open 2021; 10: 100094
  42. Zhao D, Wu GY. Prolonged direct hyperbilirubinemia following acute hepatitis: when not to worry?. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2024; 12 (12) 985-987
  43. Lei Y, Lu X, Duan X, Tang W, Wang Q. Bilirubin is a superior biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and for differential diagnosis of benign liver disease. J Lab Med 2023; 47 (05) 233-241
  44. Ramírez-Mejía MM, Castillo-Castañeda SM, Pal SC, Qi X, Méndez-Sánchez N. The multifaceted role of bilirubin in liver disease: a literature review. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2024; 12 (11) 939-948
  45. Patel JJ, Taneja A, Niccum D, Kumar G, Jacobs E, Nanchal R. The association of serum bilirubin levels on the outcomes of severe sepsis. J Intensive Care Med 2015; 30 (01) 23-29
  46. Lee M, Jang M, Jo J. et al. Hyperbilirubinemia as a risk factor for mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (13) 4203
  47. Ostermann M, Legrand M, Meersch M, Srisawat N, Zarbock A, Kellum JA. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14 (01) 145
  48. Priyanka P, Zarbock A, Izawa J, Gleason TG, Renfurm RW, Kellum JA. The impact of acute kidney injury by serum creatinine or urine output criteria on major adverse kidney events in cardiac surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162 (01) 143-151.e7
  49. Rehou S, Jeschke MG. Admission creatinine is associated with poor outcomes in burn patients. Burns 2022; 48 (06) 1355-1363
  50. Li L, Zhang Z, Xiong Y. et al. Relationship between initial urine output and mortality in patients hospitalized in cardiovascular intensive care units: More is not better. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 853217
  51. Poston JT, Koyner JL. Sepsis associated acute kidney injury. BMJ 2019; 364: k4891
  52. Dellepiane S, Marengo M, Cantaluppi V. Detrimental cross-talk between sepsis and acute kidney injury: new pathogenic mechanisms, early biomarkers and targeted therapies. Crit Care 2016; 20: 61
  53. Periayah MH, Halim AS, Mat Saad AZ. Mechanism action of platelets and crucial blood coagulation pathways in hemostasis. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res 2017; 11 (04) 319-327
  54. Zhang R, Liu Y, Zhang B. et al. Coagulopathy is associated with multiple organ damage and prognosis of COVID-19. EXCLI J 2021; 20: 174-191
  55. Matics TJ, Sanchez-Pinto LN. Adaptation and validation of a pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score and evaluation of the sepsis-3 definitions in critically ill children. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (10) e172352-e172352
  56. Schlapbach LJ, Straney L, Bellomo R, MacLaren G, Pilcher D. Prognostic accuracy of age-adapted SOFA, SIRS, PELOD-2, and qSOFA for in-hospital mortality among children with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44 (02) 179-188
  57. Yuan Y, Wang G, Chen X. et al. Thrombocytopenia and increased risk of adverse outcome in COVID-19 patients. PeerJ 2022; 10: e13608
  58. Malik A, Taksande A, Meshram R. Pediatric sequential organ assessment score: a comprehensive review of the prognostic marker in the pediatric intensive care unit. Cureus 2024; 16 (05) e60034
  59. Maheshwari N, Agarwal N. The role of pediatric sequential organ failure assessment lactate score in predicting the clinical outcome of critically ill children: a single-center, prospective, observational study. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2023; 10 (05) 193-198
  60. Baloch SH, Shaikh I, Gowa MA, Lohano PD, Ibrahim MN. Comparison of pediatric sequential organ failure assessment and pediatric risk of mortality III score as mortality prediction in pediatric intensive care unit. Cureus 2022; 14 (01) e21055
  61. Arslan G, Besci T, Özdemir G. et al. Predictive value of PRISM-4, PIM-3, CRP, albumin, CRP/albumin ratio and lactate in critically ill children. Children (Basel) 2023; 10 (11) 1731
  62. Huo Z, Booth J, Monks T. et al. Dynamic mortality prediction in critically Ill children during interhospital transports to PICUs using explainable AI. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 108
  63. Zieg J, Ghose S, Raina R. Electrolyte disorders related emergencies in children. BMC Nephrol 2024; 25 (01) 282
  64. Berta DM, Teketelew BB, Chane E. et al. Hematological changes in women with cervical cancer before and after cancer treatment: retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 27630
  65. Buranapattama T, Phumeetham S, Piyaphanee N, Sukharomana M, Charuvanij S. Mortality in children and adolescents with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2025; 23 (01) 20
  66. Camarena-Vielma L, Lona-Reyes JC, Vázquez-Bojórquez MS. et al. Implementation of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 and the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in an intensive care unit in Mexico. Arch Argent Pediatr 2022; 120 (05) 332-335
  67. Iyanna N, Donohue JK, Lorence JM. et al. Early Glasgow coma scale score and prediction of traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis of three harmonized prehospital randomized clinical trials. Prehosp Emerg Care 2024; 24: 1-9
  68. Molla MT, Endeshaw AS, Kumie FT, Lakew TJ. The magnitude of pediatric mortality and determinant factors in intensive care units in a low-resource country, Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10: 1117497
  69. Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW. et al; PROVE Network Investigators. Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44 (11) 1914-1922
  70. Abrams D, Schmidt M, Pham T. et al. Mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome during extracorporeal life support. Research and practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201 (05) 514-525
  71. Marti S, Carsin A-E, Sampol J. et al. Higher mortality and intubation rate in COVID-19 patients treated with noninvasive ventilation compared with high-flow oxygen or CPAP. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 6527
  72. Nasser MM, Al-Sawah AY, Hablas WR, Mansour AM. Reliability of pediatric risk of mortality III (PRISM III) and pediatric index of mortality 3 (PIM3) scores in the pediatric intensive care unit of El-Hussein University Hospital. Al-Azhar J Pediatr. 2020; 23 (03) 1048-1071
  73. Crintea IN, Cindrea AC, Mederle OA, Trebuian CI, Timar R. Electrolyte imbalances and metabolic emergencies in obesity: mechanisms and clinical implications. Diseases 2025; 13 (03) 69
  74. Iheagwam FN, Joseph AJ, Adedoyin ED, Iheagwam OT, Ejoh SA. Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetes: shedding light on a widespread oversight. Pathophysiology 2025; 32 (01) 9
  75. Botan E, Gün E, Şden EK. et al. Characteristics and timing of mortality in children dying in pediatric intensive care: a 5-year experience. Acute Crit Care 2022; 37 (04) 644-653
  76. Im Y, Park HY, Lee J-Y. et al. Impact of preserved ratio impaired spirometry on coronary artery calcium score progression: a longitudinal cohort study. ERJ Open Res 2024; 10 (01) 1-10
  77. Anjali M, Unnikrishnan DT. Effectiveness of PRISM III score in predicting the severity of illness and mortality of children admitted to pediatric intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study. Gaz Egypt Paediatr Assoc 2023; 71 (01) 25
  78. Muthupandi V, Dianagrace R, Narayanan E, Sathya J. Comparison of PRISM III and PIM II score in predicting mortality in paediatric intensive care unit: an observational study. J Clin Diagn Res 2022; 16 (02) 8-12
  79. Srinivas N, Venugopal K, Venkatesha GA, Chidanand N. Comparison of Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM III) score with Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM III) score in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: a single center, prospective observational study from South India. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2024; 11 (05) 208-212
  80. Kellum JA, Romagnani P, Ashuntantang G, Ronco C, Zarbock A, Anders H-J. Acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7 (01) 52
  81. Tatlisu MA, Kaya A, Keskin M. et al. The association of blood urea nitrogen levels with mortality in acute pulmonary embolism. J Crit Care 2017; 39: 248-253
  82. Cakar MA, Gunduz H, Vatan MB, Kocayigit I, Akdemir R. The effect of admission creatinine levels on one-year mortality in acute myocardial infarction. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012 (01) 186495
  83. Luo H, Yang X, Chen K, Lan S, Liao G, Xu J. Blood creatinine and urea nitrogen at ICU admission and the risk of in-hospital death and 1-year mortality in patients with intracranial hemorrhage. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 967614
  84. Agrwal S, Saxena R, Jha M, Jhamb U, Pallavi. Comparison of pSOFA with PRISM III and PIM 2 as predictors of outcome in a tertiary care pediatric ICU: a prospective cross-sectional study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024; 28 (08) 796-801
  85. Angurana SK, Dhaliwal MS, Choudhary A. Unified severity and organ dysfunction scoring system in pediatric intensive care unit: a pressing priority. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2023; 10 (05) 181-183
  86. Selewski DT, Cornell TT, Heung M. et al. Validation of the KDIGO acute kidney injury criteria in a pediatric critical care population. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40 (10) 1481-1488